NCERTCHEM 3D
Class 11Physical ChemistryChapter 6: Equilibrium

Equilibrium

NCERT Syllabus Key Concepts:
Dynamic Equilibrium in Physical Phase Processes (Solid-Liquid, Liquid-Vapour, Solid-Vapour)
Dynamic Nature of Chemical Equilibrium & Haber Deuterium (D2) Isotope Scrambling
Law of Mass Action & Equilibrium Constant Expression (Kc = [C]^c [D]^d / [A]^a [B]^b)
Gaseous Homogeneous Equilibria & Relation Between Kp and Kc (Kp = Kc (RT)^Δn)
Heterogeneous Equilibria & Invariant Constant Activity of Pure Solids and Pure Liquids
Reaction Quotient (Qc) & Direction of Reaction (Qc < Kc forward, Qc > Kc reverse, Qc = Kc equilibrium)
Thermodynamic Equilibrium Link: ΔrG° = -RT ln K = -2.303 RT log K
Le Chatelier’s Principle: Perturbations in Concentration (Fe³⁺-SCN⁻ Blood-Red Complex)
Effect of Pressure, Volume, and Inert Gas Addition (Constant Volume vs Constant Pressure)
Effect of Temperature & van ’t Hoff Equation: Exothermic (K decreases) vs Endothermic (K increases)
Catalyst Invariance: Activation Energy Lowering Without Changing Equilibrium Position or Kc
Michael Faraday Electrolyte Classification: Strong vs Weak Electrolytes & Dielectric Shielding
Acid-Base Theoretical Frameworks: Arrhenius, Brönsted-Lowry, and Lewis Concepts
Autoionization of Water, Ionic Product (Kw = [H⁺][OH⁻] = 10⁻¹⁴ at 298 K) & Temperature Dependence
Logarithmic pH Scale (pH = -log[H⁺], pH + pOH = 14) & 4-Strip pH Paper Diagnostics
Weak Acid and Weak Base Ionization Constants (Ka, Kb) & Ostwald’s Dilution Law (α ≈ √(K/c))
Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs Relation: Ka × Kb = Kw & pKa + pKb = 14.00
Polybasic Acids (Ka1 >> Ka2 >> Ka3) & Electrostatic Proton Detachment Barrier
Common-Ion Effect: Suppression of Weak Electrolyte Dissociation by Added Common Ions
Hydrolysis of Salts: 4 Distinct Categories & Analytical pH Formulations
Buffer Solutions: Acidic & Basic Buffers, Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation & Dilution Invariance
Solubility Equilibria of Sparingly Soluble Salts & Solubility Product Constant (Ksp)
Precipitation Prediction Criteria: Ionic Product Qsp vs Ksp (Qsp > Ksp Precipitates)
Common-Ion Effect on Solubility (NaCl / HCl Gas & Qualitative Cation Analysis)
pH-Dependent Solubility of Salts of Weak Acids: S = √(Ksp([H⁺] + Ka) / Ka)

Unit 6: Equilibrium

NCERT Chemistry Class 11: Chapter 6
"Equilibrium represents a state in which opposing forces or influences are balanced. In chemical processes, it is not a state of inert cessation, but an energetic, perfectly balanced dynamic dance where forward and reverse transformations occur at identical rates."


The Big Picture: Why Study Chemical and Ionic Equilibrium?#

In Unit 5, we investigated the thermodynamic criteria governing whether a chemical transformation can occur spontaneously. Thermodynamics dictates the ultimate direction of a process through the standard Gibbs energy change:

ΔrG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -RT \ln K

However, thermodynamics alone does not tell us how fast a system approaches this state, nor does it describe the physical reality of the reaction mixture when the net drive reaches zero. Most chemical reactions do not proceed irreversibly to 100% completion. Instead, as product concentrations accumulate, backward reactions begin to operate, culminating in a state where reactants and products coexist indefinitely in fixed proportions.

This stationary macroscopic state is termed chemical equilibrium. It is of profound importance across natural, biological, and industrial domains:

  1. Physiological Oxygen Transport: The binding of oxygen to hemoglobin in pulmonary capillaries and its subsequent release in oxygen-depleted muscular tissues is governed by a reversible chemical equilibrium:

Hb(aq)+4O2(g)⇌Hb(O2)4(aq)\mathrm{Hb}\text{(aq)} + 4\mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Hb(O}_2)_4\text{(aq)}

A fatal disruption of this balance occurs in carbon monoxide poisoning, where CO\mathrm{CO} binds to hemoglobin with an affinity approximately 200 times greater than oxygen, shifting the equilibrium irreversibly and starving cellular respiration. 2. Industrial Synthesis Optimization: The worldwide annual synthesis of ammonia via the Haber process exceeds one hundred million tonnes, providing the primary feedstock for synthetic fertilizers. Because the synthesis reaction is reversible and exothermic:

N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g),ΔrH∘=−92.38 kJ/mol\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(g)}, \quad \Delta_r H^{\circ} = -92.38\text{ kJ/mol}

Chemical engineers must rigorously apply Le Chatelier's principle to select optimum temperatures (700 K700\text{ K} to 750 K750\text{ K}), elevated pressures (200 bar200\text{ bar}), and iron catalysts to maximize economic yield without sacrificing reaction rate. 3. Aqueous and Cellular Homeostasis: Human blood maintains a strictly buffered pH\text{pH} of 7.40±0.057.40 \pm 0.05. A deviation below 7.357.35 (acidosis) or above 7.457.45 (alkalosis) causes severe metabolic trauma or death. This stability is maintained by dynamic ionic equilibria involving carbonic acid, bicarbonate ions, and cellular phosphate buffers.

How to Use the Interactive Lab Modules:
Alongside this chapter, you have access to six specialized simulation modules in the right-hand workspace:

  1. Reaction Tank & Dynamic Equilibrium (KcK_c Explorer): Observe forward and reverse reactions occurring simultaneously at identical rates; test deuterium isotope scrambling; verify that catalysts accelerate equilibrium attainment without altering equilibrium concentrations.
  2. Disturb the Equilibrium (Le Chatelier Dashboard): Perturb concentration (iron-thiocyanate complex), compress gas volumes, heat or cool reactions, and add inert gases to observe the system restore balance.
  3. Acid-Base & Ka/KbK_a/K_b Simulator: Compare strong versus weak acid ionization; test Ostwald's dilution law; observe common-ion suppression.
  4. pH Explorer & 4-Strip Paper Lab: Manipulate hydronium concentration across 14 orders of magnitude; analyze 4-strip colorimetric matching; solve the ultra-dilute acid paradox (10−8 M HCl10^{-8}\text{ M HCl}).
  5. Buffer Solutions Lab: Subject buffered and unbuffered water to strong acid/base stress; verify the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and observe dilution invariance.
  6. Solubility & Precipitation Lab (KspK_{sp}): Predict precipitate formation by comparing QspQ_{sp} with KspK_{sp}; examine common-ion suppression and pH-dependent solubility.

6.1 Equilibrium in Physical Processes#

The fundamental characteristics of dynamic equilibrium are most clearly recognized by examining phase transformation processes in closed systems. Phase changes involve no rearrangement of chemical bonds, allowing us to isolate the physics of bidirectional rate equality.

The three primary phase equilibria are:

Solid⇌Liquid\text{Solid} \rightleftharpoons \text{Liquid} Liquid⇌Vapour\text{Liquid} \rightleftharpoons \text{Vapour} Solid⇌Vapour\text{Solid} \rightleftharpoons \text{Vapour}


6.1.1 Solid-Liquid Equilibrium#

Consider pure water ice and liquid water placed inside a perfectly insulated Dewar flask at standard atmospheric pressure (1.013 bar1.013\text{ bar}) and 273.15 K273.15\text{ K} (0∘C0^{\circ}\text{C}). Because the vessel is insulated, no heat enters or leaves the system.

Experimental observations reveal:

  • The mass of ice and the mass of liquid water remain completely invariant over time.
  • The temperature remains fixed at 273.15 K273.15\text{ K}.

This constancy does not indicate a static, motionless boundary. At the microscopic interface between solid ice and liquid water:

  1. Energetic liquid water molecules collide with the ice crystal lattice, lose translational momentum, and freeze into the rigid hydrogen-bonded framework.
  2. Simultaneously, surface water molecules within the ice lattice absorb thermal vibrational energy and break away into the liquid phase.
  3. At 273.15 K273.15\text{ K} and 1.013 bar1.013\text{ bar}, the rate of melting equals the rate of freezing:

Rate of transfer of molecules from ice to water=Rate of transfer of molecules from water to ice\text{Rate of transfer of molecules from ice to water} = \text{Rate of transfer of molecules from water to ice}

H2O(s)⇌H2O(l)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}

For any pure substance at atmospheric pressure, the unique temperature at which solid and liquid phases coexist in dynamic equilibrium is called the normal melting point or normal freezing point.


6.1.2 Liquid-Vapour Equilibrium#

To understand liquid-vapour equilibrium, consider a transparent evacuated chamber connected to a mercury U-tube manometer:

  1. Anhydrous calcium chloride or phosphorus pentoxide is placed inside the chamber for several hours to eliminate all traces of ambient water vapour.
  2. The drying agent is tilted away, and a petri dish containing liquid water is quickly introduced into the dry chamber.
Time StagePhysical ObservationMicroscopic Rate Dynamic
Initial Stage (t=0t = 0)Mercury levels in both manometer limbs are equal. Water level in dish begins to drop.Evaporation begins at rate revapr_{\text{evap}}, which depends solely on surface area and temperature. Condensation rate rcond=0r_{\text{cond}} = 0 because no vapour molecules exist.
Intermediate Stage (t>0t > 0)Mercury level in the open manometer limb rises steadily. Water level in the dish continues to diminish.As vapour concentration increases, molecules strike the liquid surface and are captured. Condensation rate rcondr_{\text{cond}} rises progressively while revapr_{\text{evap}} stays constant.
Equilibrium Stage (t=teqt = t_{\text{eq}})Mercury level difference becomes completely stationary. Water level stops decreasing.The rate of condensation has increased until it exactly equals the rate of evaporation: revap=rcondr_{\text{evap}} = r_{\text{cond}}.

H2O(l)⇌H2O(vap)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(vap)}

The partial pressure exerted by the vapor in equilibrium with the liquid at a specified temperature is defined as the equilibrium vapour pressure (or saturated vapour pressure).

Vapour pressure is an intensive property that depends strictly on temperature and the intermolecular force strength of the liquid:

  • Volatile liquids with weak intermolecular forces (such as diethyl ether and acetone) exhibit high equilibrium vapour pressures at room temperature.
  • Strongly hydrogen-bonded liquids (such as water and ethylene glycol) exhibit substantially lower equilibrium vapour pressures.
  • When the vapour pressure of a liquid equals the external atmospheric pressure, boiling occurs throughout the bulk liquid. At standard atmospheric pressure (1.013 bar1.013\text{ bar}), this temperature is defined as the normal boiling point (100∘C100^{\circ}\text{C} for pure water).
  • At high altitudes where atmospheric pressure is reduced, the boiling point of water decreases proportionally. In an open container, dynamic equilibrium can never be established because vapour molecules continuously diffuse into the atmosphere, meaning rcond≪revapr_{\text{cond}} \ll r_{\text{evap}}.

6.1.3 Solid-Vapour Equilibrium#

Substances capable of subliming transition directly between solid and gaseous phases without passing through an intermediate liquid state:

I2(s)⇌I2(vap)\mathrm{I}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{I}_2\text{(vap)}

When solid crystalline iodine is sealed within a closed glass flask at room temperature:

  1. Sublimation produces violet gaseous iodine molecules that diffuse throughout the vessel.
  2. The intensity of the purple color increases with time.
  3. Eventually, the color intensity reaches a steady, constant value.
  4. At this point, the rate of sublimation of solid iodine equals the rate of condensation of gaseous iodine back onto the crystal surfaces.

Similar solid-vapour dynamic equilibria are exhibited by camphor and ammonium chloride:

Camphor(s)⇌Camphor(vap)\text{Camphor(s)} \rightleftharpoons \text{Camphor(vap)} NH4Cl(s)⇌NH4Cl(vap)\mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl}\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl}\text{(vap)}


6.1.4 Equilibrium Involving Dissolution of Solids or Gases in Liquids#

Dissolution of Solids in Liquids

When table sugar (sucrose) is added incrementally to a fixed volume of water at 298 K298\text{ K}, solute molecules dissolve until reaching a concentration threshold beyond which no further solid dissolves. The solution is now saturated.

In a saturated solution, a dynamic equilibrium operates between the dissolved solute molecules and the solid crystal phase:

Sugar(solid)⇌Sugar(solution)\text{Sugar(solid)} \rightleftharpoons \text{Sugar(solution)} Rate of dissolution=Rate of crystallisation\text{Rate of dissolution} = \text{Rate of crystallisation}

Experimental Proof of Dynamic Equilibrium: Radioactive Sugar Tracer Experiment
To determine whether dissolution halts completely at saturation (a static model) or continues at equal opposing rates (a dynamic model), a saturated solution of non-radioactive sucrose is prepared.
A small quantity of radioactive sucrose containing carbon-14 (14C^{14}\mathrm{C}) is introduced into this saturated solution:

  1. If equilibrium were static, the radioactive sugar would remain entirely in the solid phase because the solution was already fully saturated.
  2. In reality, Geiger-Müller counter measurements detect radioactive sugar molecules appearing in the aqueous solution almost immediately.
  3. Over time, the ratio of radioactive to non-radioactive sucrose molecules in the solution increases continuously until reaching a stable, constant value.
    This confirms that molecules constantly detach from the solid crystal into solution while an identical number of dissolved molecules precipitate onto the solid lattice.

Dissolution of Gases in Liquids: Henry's Law

When carbonated soda water is sealed under high pressure, gaseous carbon dioxide dissolves into the aqueous phase:

CO2(g)⇌CO2(aq)\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CO}_2\text{(aq)}

This equilibrium is governed by Henry's Law, which states that the mass of a gas dissolved in a given volume of liquid at a given temperature is directly proportional to the partial pressure of the gas above the liquid surface:

m=kH⋅pm = k_H \cdot p

Alternatively, in terms of mole fraction xx or molar concentration:

p=KH⋅xp = K_H \cdot x

When a soda bottle cap is removed:

  1. The headspace pressure drops abruptly from several atmospheres to atmospheric carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2≈0.0004 barp_{\mathrm{CO}_2} \approx 0.0004\text{ bar}).
  2. The equilibrium shifts immediately to relieve the pressure drop: dissolved CO2\mathrm{CO}_2 comes out of solution as vigorous effervescence.
  3. If left open to ambient air, the beverage eventually turns flat as dissolved carbon dioxide drops to its new, much lower equilibrium concentration.

6.1.5 General Characteristics of Physical Equilibria#

The unifying physical principles of all equilibria in physical processes are summarized in Table 6.1:

Physical ProcessEquilibrium EquationCharacteristic Invariant Parameter at Constant Temperature
Liquid-VapourH2O(l)⇌H2O(g)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)}Equilibrium vapour pressure pH2Op_{\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}} is constant at a given temperature.
Solid-LiquidH2O(s)⇌H2O(l)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}Melting point is fixed at a specified external pressure.
Solid-VapourI2(s)⇌I2(g)\mathrm{I}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)}Sublimation vapour pressure pI2p_{\mathrm{I}_2} is constant at a given temperature.
Solid in LiquidSolute(s)⇌Solute(aq)\text{Solute(s)} \rightleftharpoons \text{Solute(aq)}Concentration of dissolved solute in saturated solution is constant.
Gas in LiquidCO2(g)⇌CO2(aq)\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CO}_2\text{(aq)}Ratio [CO2(aq)][CO2(g)]\frac{[\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(aq)}]}{[\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}]} or [CO2(aq)]pCO2\frac{[\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(aq)}]}{p_{\mathrm{CO}_2}} is constant (Henry's Law).

From these systems, five essential rules emerge:

  1. Dynamic equilibrium is possible only within a closed system where matter cannot enter or exit.
  2. Both opposing processes occur simultaneously at identical rates, maintaining dynamic microscopic turnover despite static macroscopic properties.
  3. All measurable macroscopic properties (pressure, concentration, density, color intensity, temperature) remain constant over time.
  4. Equilibrium is characterized by a constant numerical value of an intensive thermodynamic parameter at a fixed temperature.
  5. The magnitude of this parameter indicates the physical extent to which the process has progressed before achieving equilibrium.

6.2 Equilibrium in Chemical Processes: Dynamic Equilibrium#

Just as in physical phase transitions, reversible chemical reactions reach a condition where the rates of forward and reverse reactions balance each other.

Consider a generalized reversible elementary chemical transformation:

A+B⇌C+D\mathrm{A} + \mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{C} + \mathrm{D}

  1. At time t=0t = 0, only reactants A\mathrm{A} and B\mathrm{B} are present at initial concentrations [A]0[\mathrm{A}]_0 and [B]0[\mathrm{B}]_0. The forward rate is maximal: rf=kf[A][B]r_f = k_f [\mathrm{A}] [\mathrm{B}]. The reverse rate is zero: rr=kr[C][D]=0r_r = k_r [\mathrm{C}] [\mathrm{D}] = 0.
  2. As reactants collide and form products, [A][\mathrm{A}] and [B][\mathrm{B}] decrease, causing the forward rate rfr_f to decline continuously.
  3. Simultaneously, product concentrations [C][\mathrm{C}] and [D][\mathrm{D}] accumulate, causing the reverse rate rrr_r to rise from zero.
  4. Eventually, a point is reached where:

rf=rr  ⟹  kf[A]eq[B]eq=kr[C]eq[D]eqr_f = r_r \implies k_f [\mathrm{A}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{B}]_{\text{eq}} = k_r [\mathrm{C}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{D}]_{\text{eq}}

From this moment onward, the concentrations of all reactants and products remain invariant. This condition is chemical equilibrium.

Reaction StageReactants A\mathrm{A} and B\mathrm{B}Products C\mathrm{C} and D\mathrm{D}Net Dynamic Process
Initial Stage (t=0t = 0)Maximal concentrations; forward rate rfr_f is at its maximum.Zero concentration; reverse rate rr=0r_r = 0.Rapid net forward conversion into products.
Transient Approach (0<t<teq0 < t < t_{\text{eq}})Concentrations decay asymptotically; rfr_f slows down.Concentrations accumulate progressively; rrr_r increases from zero.Net forward rate diminishes (rf−rr→0r_f - r_r \rightarrow 0).
Equilibrium State (t≥teqt \ge t_{\text{eq}})Concentrations level off into constant horizontal plateaus.Concentrations level off into constant horizontal plateaus.Forward and reverse rates are identical (rf=rrr_f = r_r).

Classification of Chemical Reactions by Extent of Reaction#

Chemical reactions are grouped into three categories based on where their equilibrium position lies:

  1. Reactions proceeding nearly to completion: Equilibrium mixtures contain virtually pure products with barely detectable traces of reactants (K>103K > 10^3). Example: H2(g)+12O2(g)⇌H2O(l)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} with Kc≈2.4×1047K_c \approx 2.4 \times 10^{47} at 500 K500\text{ K}.
  2. Reactions that barely proceed: Equilibrium mixtures consist almost entirely of unreacted starting materials with only minute traces of products formed (K<10−3K < 10^{-3}). Example: N2(g)+O2(g)⇌2NO(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}\text{(g)} with Kc≈4.8×10−31K_c \approx 4.8 \times 10^{-31} at 298 K298\text{ K}.
  3. Reactions with comparable reactant and product concentrations: Significant concentrations of both reactants and products coexist at equilibrium (10−3≤K≤10310^{-3} \le K \le 10^3). Example: H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}\text{(g)} with Kc=57.0K_c = 57.0 at 700 K700\text{ K}.

Demonstrating Dynamic Equilibrium: The Haber Deuterium Experiment#

To rigorously prove that chemical equilibrium is dynamic rather than static, Fritz Haber conducted an elegant isotopic exchange experiment:

  1. Dihydrogen and dinitrogen are reacted under high pressure and temperature with an iron catalyst until equilibrium is reached:

N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(g)}

  1. In an identical separate vessel under identical conditions, deuterium gas (D2D_2, heavy hydrogen) is reacted with dinitrogen until reaching equilibrium:

N2(g)+3D2(g)⇌2ND3(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{D}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{ND}_3\text{(g)}

  1. Both equilibrium vessels are connected and their contents allowed to mix. The overall concentrations of total ammonia and total hydrogen remain completely unchanged.
  2. However, when the mixture is analyzed using a mass spectrometer, four distinct isotopic forms of ammonia are detected:

NH3,NH2D,NHD2,ND3\mathrm{NH}_3, \quad \mathrm{NH}_2\mathrm{D}, \quad \mathrm{NHD}_2, \quad \mathrm{ND}_3

as well as all three forms of dihydrogen:

H2,HD,D2\mathrm{H}_2, \quad \mathrm{HD}, \quad \mathrm{D}_2

If chemical reactions stopped when reaching equilibrium, zero isotopic scrambling could occur. The formation of mixed species like NH2D\mathrm{NH}_2\mathrm{D} and HD\mathrm{HD} proves that forward and reverse reactions continue to occur at identical rates.


Reversible Approach from Either Direction#

A fundamental property of chemical equilibrium is that the same equilibrium composition is attained regardless of whether the reaction starts from pure reactants or pure products, provided the total atomic composition and temperature are identical.

For the hydrogen-iodine system:

H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}\text{(g)}

  • If we start with 1.0 mol H21.0\text{ mol } \mathrm{H}_2 and 1.0 mol I21.0\text{ mol } \mathrm{I}_2 in a 1 L1\text{ L} sealed container at 731 K731\text{ K}, purple iodine vapour fades as colorless HI\mathrm{HI} forms until concentrations stabilize.
  • If we start with 2.0 mol HI2.0\text{ mol } \mathrm{HI} in an identical 1 L1\text{ L} vessel at 731 K731\text{ K}, colorless gas decomposes to produce purple I2\mathrm{I}_2 vapour and H2\mathrm{H}_2.
  • At equilibrium, both vessels reach identical final concentrations of [H2][\mathrm{H}_2], [I2][\mathrm{I}_2], and [HI][\mathrm{HI}].

Interactive Simulation Experiment: Dynamic Equilibrium Reaction Tank
Open the Reaction Tank tab in the simulation suite:

  1. Set initial reactants [A]0=1.0 M[\mathrm{A}]_0 = 1.0\text{ M}, [B]0=1.0 M[\mathrm{B}]_0 = 1.0\text{ M}, and products [C]0=[D]0=0[\mathrm{C}]_0 = [\mathrm{D}]_0 = 0.
  2. Press Play. Observe the forward reaction rate bar rfr_f start high and decrease, while the reverse rate bar rrr_r climbs from zero.
  3. Observe the point where both rate bars align (rf=rrr_f = r_r). The concentration monitors lock into stable equilibrium values.
  4. Now toggle Isotope Scrambling (H/D Exchange). Watch reactant and product labels exchange isotopic tags, confirming microscopic turnover at macroscopic equilibrium.

6.3 Law of Chemical Equilibrium and Equilibrium Constant#

On the basis of empirical investigations of reversible reactions, Norwegian chemists Cato Maximilian Guldberg and Peter Waage proposed the Law of Mass Action in 1864.

For a general reversible reaction:

aA+bB⇌cC+dDa\mathrm{A} + b\mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons c\mathrm{C} + d\mathrm{D}

The Equilibrium Law states that at a given temperature, the product of the equilibrium concentrations of the products raised to their respective stoichiometric coefficients, divided by the product of the equilibrium concentrations of the reactants raised to their respective stoichiometric coefficients, is a constant:

Kc=[C]c[D]d[A]a[B]bK_c = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]^c [\mathrm{D}]^d}{[\mathrm{A}]^a [\mathrm{B}]^b}

where:

  • [A],[B],[C],[D][\mathrm{A}], [\mathrm{B}], [\mathrm{C}], [\mathrm{D}] denote molar concentrations at equilibrium (expressed in mol/L\text{mol/L} or M\text{M}).
  • a,b,c,da, b, c, d are the stoichiometric coefficients from the balanced chemical equation.
  • KcK_c is the equilibrium constant expressed in concentration units.

Kinetic Derivation of the Equilibrium Law#

For an elementary bidirectional reaction:

A+B⇌kfkrC+D\mathrm{A} + \mathrm{B} \underset{k_r}{\overset{k_f}{\rightleftharpoons}} \mathrm{C} + \mathrm{D}

The rate of the forward reaction is:

rf=kf[A][B]r_f = k_f [\mathrm{A}][\mathrm{B}]

The rate of the reverse reaction is:

rr=kr[C][D]r_r = k_r [\mathrm{C}][\mathrm{D}]

At dynamic equilibrium, the forward and reverse rates are equal:

rf=rr  ⟹  kf[A]eq[B]eq=kr[C]eq[D]eqr_f = r_r \implies k_f [\mathrm{A}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{B}]_{\text{eq}} = k_r [\mathrm{C}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{D}]_{\text{eq}}

Rearranging gives the ratio of rate constants:

kfkr=[C]eq[D]eq[A]eq[B]eq=Kc\frac{k_f}{k_r} = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{D}]_{\text{eq}}}{[\mathrm{A}]_{\text{eq}} [\mathrm{B}]_{\text{eq}}} = K_c

Because the forward and reverse rate constants kfk_f and krk_r are intrinsic properties that depend solely on temperature, their quotient KcK_c is also constant at a specified temperature.


Rules for Writing Equilibrium Expressions#

When manipulating chemical equations, the form of the equilibrium constant changes systematically:

Operation on Chemical EquationNew Chemical EquationNew Equilibrium Constant (K′K')Mathematical Relation
Reverse ReactioncC+dD⇌aA+bBc\mathrm{C} + d\mathrm{D} \rightleftharpoons a\mathrm{A} + b\mathrm{B}Kc′=[A]a[B]b[C]c[D]dK'_c = \frac{[\mathrm{A}]^a [\mathrm{B}]^b}{[\mathrm{C}]^c [\mathrm{D}]^d}Kc′=1KcK'_c = \frac{1}{K_c}
Multiply by Factor nnnaA+nbB⇌ncC+ndDna\mathrm{A} + nb\mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons nc\mathrm{C} + nd\mathrm{D}Kc′′=[C]nc[D]nd[A]na[B]nbK''_c = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]^{nc} [\mathrm{D}]^{nd}}{[\mathrm{A}]^{na} [\mathrm{B}]^{nb}}Kc′′=(Kc)nK''_c = (K_c)^n
Divide by Factor nn (or multiply by 1/n1/n)anA+bnB⇌cnC+dnD\frac{a}{n}\mathrm{A} + \frac{b}{n}\mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons \frac{c}{n}\mathrm{C} + \frac{d}{n}\mathrm{D}Kc′′′=(Kc)1/nK'''_c = \left(K_c\right)^{1/n}Kc′′′=KcnK'''_c = \sqrt[n]{K_c}
Add Two ReactionsReaction (1)+Reaction (2)\text{Reaction (1)} + \text{Reaction (2)}Knet=K1×K2K_{\text{net}} = K_1 \times K_2Knet=∏KiK_{\text{net}} = \prod K_i

Important Caveat:
The numerical value of an equilibrium constant is meaningless unless accompanied by the explicitly balanced chemical equation, because changing the stoichiometric coefficients raises KcK_c to that power.


6.4 Homogeneous Equilibria#

In a homogeneous equilibrium, all reacting species and products exist within a single phase (gas phase, pure liquid phase, or uniform liquid solution).

Examples:

  • Gaseous homogeneous equilibrium:

N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(g)}

  • Liquid esterification homogeneous equilibrium:

CH3COOH(l)+C2H5OH(l)⇌CH3COOC2H5(l)+H2O(l)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(l)} + \mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{OH}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOC}_2\mathrm{H}_5\text{(l)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}

  • Aqueous ionic homogeneous equilibrium:

Fe3+(aq)+SCN−(aq)⇌[Fe(SCN)]2+(aq)\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{SCN}^-\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons [\mathrm{Fe(SCN)}]^{2+}\text{(aq)}


6.4.1 Equilibrium Constant in Gaseous Systems (KpK_p)#

For reactions involving gases, measuring partial pressures in bar or atmospheres is often more practical than determining molar concentrations directly.

From the Ideal Gas Equation:

pV=nRT  ⟹  p=(nV)RT=cRTpV = nRT \implies p = \left(\frac{n}{V}\right)RT = cRT

where:

  • c=nVc = \frac{n}{V} is the molar concentration in mol/L\text{mol/L}.
  • pp is the partial pressure in bar.
  • R=0.0831 bar L mol−1 K−1R = 0.0831\text{ bar L mol}^{-1}\text{ K}^{-1}.
  • TT is the absolute temperature in Kelvin.

Therefore, the partial pressure of any ideal gas component is directly proportional to its molar concentration at constant temperature:

pi=[i]RTp_i = [i]RT

Consider the general gaseous reaction:

aA(g)+bB(g)⇌cC(g)+dD(g)a\mathrm{A}\text{(g)} + b\mathrm{B}\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons c\mathrm{C}\text{(g)} + d\mathrm{D}\text{(g)}

The equilibrium constant expressed in partial pressures is:

Kp=(pC)c(pD)d(pA)a(pB)bK_p = \frac{(p_{\mathrm{C}})^c (p_{\mathrm{D}})^d}{(p_{\mathrm{A}})^a (p_{\mathrm{B}})^b}

Substituting pi=[i]RTp_i = [i]RT:

Kp=([C]RT)c([D]RT)d([A]RT)a([B]RT)b=[C]c[D]d[A]a[B]b⋅(RT)c+d(RT)a+bK_p = \frac{([\mathrm{C}]RT)^c ([\mathrm{D}]RT)^d}{([\mathrm{A}]RT)^a ([\mathrm{B}]RT)^b} = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]^c [\mathrm{D}]^d}{[\mathrm{A}]^a [\mathrm{B}]^b} \cdot \frac{(RT)^{c+d}}{(RT)^{a+b}}

Kp=Kc(RT)(c+d)−(a+b)K_p = K_c (RT)^{(c+d) - (a+b)}

Kp=Kc(RT)ΔngK_p = K_c (RT)^{\Delta n_g}

where:

Δng=(c+d)−(a+b)=∑ngaseous products−∑ngaseous reactants\Delta n_g = (c + d) - (a + b) = \sum n_{\text{gaseous products}} - \sum n_{\text{gaseous reactants}}

Three Scenarios for the Relation between KpK_p and KcK_c

Condition on Δng\Delta n_gMathematical RelationCharacteristic ExampleConsequence
Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0Kp=Kc(RT)0=KcK_p = K_c (RT)^0 = K_cH2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}\text{(g)}KpK_p and KcK_c are numerically identical and dimensionless. Pressure changes do not shift equilibrium.
Δng>0\Delta n_g > 0Kp>KcK_p > K_c (for RT>1RT > 1)PCl5(g)⇌PCl3(g)+Cl2(g)\mathrm{PCl}_5\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{PCl}_3\text{(g)} + \mathrm{Cl}_2\text{(g)} (Δng=+1\Delta n_g = +1)Gas moles increase in forward direction. Volume expansion favors forward reaction.
Δng<0\Delta n_g < 0Kp<KcK_p < K_c (for RT>1RT > 1)N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(g)} (Δng=−2\Delta n_g = -2)Gas moles decrease in forward direction. High pressure favors forward reaction.

NCERT Problem 6.1 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The following concentrations were obtained for the formation of NH3\mathrm{NH}_3 from N2\mathrm{N}_2 and H2\mathrm{H}_2 at equilibrium at 500 K500\text{ K}: [N2]=1.5×10−2 M[\mathrm{N}_2] = 1.5 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}, [H2]=3.0×10−2 M[\mathrm{H}_2] = 3.0 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}, and [NH3]=1.2×10−2 M[\mathrm{NH}_3] = 1.2 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}. Calculate the equilibrium constant KcK_c.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • Reaction: N2(g)+3H2(g)⇌2NH3(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(g)}
  • [N2]=1.5×10−2 M[\mathrm{N}_2] = 1.5 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}
  • [H2]=3.0×10−2 M[\mathrm{H}_2] = 3.0 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}
  • [NH3]=1.2×10−2 M[\mathrm{NH}_3] = 1.2 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M}
  • Temperature T=500 KT = 500\text{ K}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kc=[NH3]2[N2][H2]3K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{NH}_3]^2}{[\mathrm{N}_2][\mathrm{H}_2]^3}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Kc=(1.2×10−2)2(1.5×10−2)×(3.0×10−2)3K_c = \frac{(1.2 \times 10^{-2})^2}{(1.5 \times 10^{-2}) \times (3.0 \times 10^{-2})^3}
(1.2×10−2)2=1.44×10−4(1.2 \times 10^{-2})^2 = 1.44 \times 10^{-4}
(3.0×10−2)3=2.7×10−5(3.0 \times 10^{-2})^3 = 2.7 \times 10^{-5}
Denominator=1.5×10−2×2.7×10−5=4.05×10−7\text{Denominator} = 1.5 \times 10^{-2} \times 2.7 \times 10^{-5} = 4.05 \times 10^{-7}
Kc=1.44×10−44.05×10−7=0.3555×103=3.56×102 L2 mol−2K_c = \frac{1.44 \times 10^{-4}}{4.05 \times 10^{-7}} = 0.3555 \times 10^3 = 3.56 \times 10^2\text{ L}^2\text{ mol}^{-2}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
An equilibrium constant of 356356 indicates that under 500 K500\text{ K} conditions, products are moderately favored over reactants at equilibrium.


NCERT Problem 6.2 (Step-by-Step Solution):
At equilibrium, the concentrations of N2=3.0×10−3 M\mathrm{N}_2 = 3.0 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}, O2=4.2×10−3 M\mathrm{O}_2 = 4.2 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}, and NO=2.8×10−3 M\mathrm{NO} = 2.8 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M} in a sealed vessel at 800 K800\text{ K}. What will be KcK_c for the reaction:
N2(g)+O2(g)⇌2NO(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}\text{(g)}

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • [N2]=3.0×10−3 M[\mathrm{N}_2] = 3.0 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • [O2]=4.2×10−3 M[\mathrm{O}_2] = 4.2 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • [NO]=2.8×10−3 M[\mathrm{NO}] = 2.8 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • T=800 KT = 800\text{ K}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kc=[NO]2[N2][O2]K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{NO}]^2}{[\mathrm{N}_2][\mathrm{O}_2]}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Kc=(2.8×10−3)2(3.0×10−3)×(4.2×10−3)K_c = \frac{(2.8 \times 10^{-3})^2}{(3.0 \times 10^{-3}) \times (4.2 \times 10^{-3})}
(2.8×10−3)2=7.84×10−6(2.8 \times 10^{-3})^2 = 7.84 \times 10^{-6}
Denominator=12.6×10−6\text{Denominator} = 12.6 \times 10^{-6}
Kc=7.84×10−612.6×10−6=0.622K_c = \frac{7.84 \times 10^{-6}}{12.6 \times 10^{-6}} = 0.622

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Since Δng=2−(1+1)=0\Delta n_g = 2 - (1 + 1) = 0, KcK_c is dimensionless, and Kp=Kc=0.622K_p = K_c = 0.622.


NCERT Problem 6.3 (Step-by-Step Solution):
PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_5, PCl3\mathrm{PCl}_3, and Cl2\mathrm{Cl}_2 are at equilibrium at 500 K500\text{ K} having concentrations 1.59 M PCl31.59\text{ M } \mathrm{PCl}_3, 1.59 M Cl21.59\text{ M } \mathrm{Cl}_2, and 1.41 M PCl51.41\text{ M } \mathrm{PCl}_5. Calculate KcK_c for the reaction:
PCl5(g)⇌PCl3(g)+Cl2(g)\mathrm{PCl}_5\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{PCl}_3\text{(g)} + \mathrm{Cl}_2\text{(g)}

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • [PCl3]=1.59 M[\mathrm{PCl}_3] = 1.59\text{ M}
  • [Cl2]=1.59 M[\mathrm{Cl}_2] = 1.59\text{ M}
  • [PCl5]=1.41 M[\mathrm{PCl}_5] = 1.41\text{ M}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kc=[PCl3][Cl2][PCl5]K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{PCl}_3][\mathrm{Cl}_2]}{[\mathrm{PCl}_5]}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Kc=1.59×1.591.41=2.52811.41=1.79 MK_c = \frac{1.59 \times 1.59}{1.41} = \frac{2.5281}{1.41} = 1.79\text{ M}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Because Kc≈1.79K_c \approx 1.79, decomposition of phosphorus pentachloride proceeds to a substantial extent at 500 K500\text{ K}, leaving comparable quantities of reactants and products.


NCERT Problem 6.4 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The value of Kc=4.24K_c = 4.24 at 800 K800\text{ K} for the reaction:
CO(g)+H2O(g)⇌CO2(g)+H2(g)\mathrm{CO}\text{(g)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)}
Calculate equilibrium concentrations of CO2\mathrm{CO}_2, H2\mathrm{H}_2, CO\mathrm{CO}, and H2O\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} at 800 K800\text{ K}, if only CO\mathrm{CO} and H2O\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} are present initially at concentrations of 0.10 M0.10\text{ M} each.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Systematic ICE Table
Let x mol/Lx\text{ mol/L} of CO\mathrm{CO} react to form x mol/Lx\text{ mol/L} of products:

ComponentInitial (M)Change (M)Equilibrium (M)
CO\mathrm{CO}0.100.10−x-x0.10−x0.10 - x
H2O\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}0.100.10−x-x0.10−x0.10 - x
CO2\mathrm{CO}_200+x+xxx
H2\mathrm{H}_200+x+xxx

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kc=[CO2][H2][CO][H2O]=x2(0.10−x)2=4.24K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{CO}_2][\mathrm{H}_2]}{[\mathrm{CO}][\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}]} = \frac{x^2}{(0.10 - x)^2} = 4.24

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Taking the square root of both sides:
x0.10−x=4.24≈2.059\frac{x}{0.10 - x} = \sqrt{4.24} \approx 2.059
x=2.059(0.10−x)=0.2059−2.059xx = 2.059(0.10 - x) = 0.2059 - 2.059x
3.059x=0.2059  ⟹  x=0.20593.059≈0.0673 M3.059x = 0.2059 \implies x = \frac{0.2059}{3.059} \approx 0.0673\text{ M}

Calculating equilibrium concentrations:

  • [CO2]=[H2]=x=0.067 M[\mathrm{CO}_2] = [\mathrm{H}_2] = x = 0.067\text{ M}
  • [CO]=[H2O]=0.10−0.067=0.033 M[\mathrm{CO}] = [\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}] = 0.10 - 0.067 = 0.033\text{ M}

Step 4: Verification & Chemical Common Sense
Kc=(0.067)2(0.033)2=(0.0670.033)2=(2.03)2=4.12≈4.24K_c = \frac{(0.067)^2}{(0.033)^2} = \left(\frac{0.067}{0.033}\right)^2 = (2.03)^2 = 4.12 \approx 4.24
All concentrations are positive and satisfy mass conservation.


NCERT Problem 6.5 (Step-by-Step Solution):
For the equilibrium:
2NOCl(g)⇌2NO(g)+Cl2(g)2\mathrm{NOCl}\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}\text{(g)} + \mathrm{Cl}_2\text{(g)}
the value of the equilibrium constant KcK_c is 3.75×10−63.75 \times 10^{-6} at 1069 K1069\text{ K}. Calculate KpK_p for the reaction at this temperature.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • Kc=3.75×10−6 MK_c = 3.75 \times 10^{-6}\text{ M}
  • T=1069 KT = 1069\text{ K}
  • R=0.0831 bar L mol−1 K−1R = 0.0831\text{ bar L mol}^{-1}\text{ K}^{-1}
  • Δng=(2+1)−2=+1\Delta n_g = (2 + 1) - 2 = +1

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kp=Kc(RT)ΔngK_p = K_c (RT)^{\Delta n_g}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Kp=3.75×10−6×(0.0831×1069)1K_p = 3.75 \times 10^{-6} \times (0.0831 \times 1069)^1
0.0831×1069=88.83390.0831 \times 1069 = 88.8339
Kp=3.75×10−6×88.8339=3.33×10−4 bar=0.0333×10−2K_p = 3.75 \times 10^{-6} \times 88.8339 = 3.33 \times 10^{-4}\text{ bar} = 0.0333 \times 10^{-2}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Because Δng=+1\Delta n_g = +1, Kp>KcK_p > K_c. Thermal dissociation of nitrosyl chloride increases with temperature.


6.5 Heterogeneous Equilibria#

An equilibrium system containing substances in more than one phase is designated a heterogeneous equilibrium.

Classic examples include:

  • Liquid-vapour water in a closed flask: H2O(l)⇌H2O(g)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)}
  • Saturated slaked lime solution: Ca(OH)2(s)⇌Ca2+(aq)+2OH−(aq)\mathrm{Ca(OH)}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}
  • Thermal decomposition of limestone in a lime kiln:

CaCO3(s)⇌ΔCaO(s)+CO2(g)\mathrm{CaCO}_3\text{(s)} \overset{\Delta}{\rightleftharpoons} \mathrm{CaO}\text{(s)} + \mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}

Why Pure Solids and Pure Liquids are Omitted from Equilibrium Constant Expressions#

Writing the equilibrium expression for limestone decomposition according to mass action:

Kc=[CaO(s)][CO2(g)][CaCO3(s)]K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{CaO(s)}][\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}]}{[\mathrm{CaCO}_3\text{(s)}]}

By definition, the molar concentration of any pure solid or pure liquid is the number of moles per unit volume:

[Pure Solid or Liquid]=nV=m/MV=mV⋅1M=ρM[\text{Pure Solid or Liquid}] = \frac{n}{V} = \frac{m / M}{V} = \frac{m}{V} \cdot \frac{1}{M} = \frac{\rho}{M}

Because density ρ\rho and molar mass MM of a pure crystalline solid or pure liquid are intensive constants independent of the total quantity present, their molar concentrations are constants at a given temperature:

  • [CaCO3(s)]=constant[\mathrm{CaCO}_3\text{(s)}] = \text{constant}
  • [CaO(s)]=constant[\mathrm{CaO(s)}] = \text{constant}

Multiplying these constants into KcK_c yields the modified equilibrium constant:

Kc′=Kc⋅[CaCO3(s)][CaO(s)]=[CO2(g)]K'_c = K_c \cdot \frac{[\mathrm{CaCO}_3\text{(s)}]}{[\mathrm{CaO(s)}]} = [\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}]

or in terms of partial pressure:

Kp=pCO2K_p = p_{\mathrm{CO}_2}

This demonstrates that at a given temperature, there is a single, fixed equilibrium pressure of carbon dioxide in contact with calcium oxide and calcium carbonate, regardless of whether you have ten grams or ten tonnes of solid limestone.

Experimentally, at 1100 K1100\text{ K}, the equilibrium pressure of CO2\mathrm{CO}_2 is 2.0×105 Pa=2.0 bar2.0 \times 10^5\text{ Pa} = 2.0\text{ bar}. Therefore:

Kp=2.0×105 Pa105 Pa=2.00K_p = \frac{2.0 \times 10^5\text{ Pa}}{10^5\text{ Pa}} = 2.00

Other heterogeneous equilibrium expressions:

  • Mond process for nickel refining:

Ni(s)+4CO(g)⇌Ni(CO)4(g)  ⟹  Kc=[Ni(CO)4][CO]4\mathrm{Ni}\text{(s)} + 4\mathrm{CO}\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ni(CO)}_4\text{(g)} \implies K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{Ni(CO)}_4]}{[\mathrm{CO}]^4}

  • Silver oxide in nitric acid:

Ag2O(s)+2HNO3(aq)⇌2AgNO3(aq)+H2O(l)  ⟹  Kc=[AgNO3]2[HNO3]2\mathrm{Ag}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(s)} + 2\mathrm{HNO}_3\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{AgNO}_3\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \implies K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{AgNO}_3]^2}{[\mathrm{HNO}_3]^2}


NCERT Problem 6.6 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The value of KpK_p for the reaction:
CO2(g)+C(s)⇌2CO(g)\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{C}\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{CO}\text{(g)}
is 3.03.0 at 1000 K1000\text{ K}. If initially pCO2=0.48 barp_{\mathrm{CO}_2} = 0.48\text{ bar} and pCO=0 barp_{\mathrm{CO}} = 0\text{ bar} and pure graphite is present, calculate the equilibrium partial pressures of CO\mathrm{CO} and CO2\mathrm{CO}_2.

Step 1: Given Quantities & ICE Table in Partial Pressures
Let x barx\text{ bar} be the decrease in pCO2p_{\mathrm{CO}_2}:

SpeciesInitial Partial Pressure (bar)Change (bar)Equilibrium Partial Pressure (bar)
CO2(g)\mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}0.480.48−x-x0.48−x0.48 - x
C(s)\mathrm{C}\text{(s)}pure solidomittedconstant
CO(g)\mathrm{CO}\text{(g)}00+2x+2x2x2x

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kp=(pCO)2pCO2=3.0K_p = \frac{(p_{\mathrm{CO}})^2}{p_{\mathrm{CO}_2}} = 3.0

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
(2x)20.48−x=3.0  ⟹  4x2=3.0(0.48−x)=1.44−3x\frac{(2x)^2}{0.48 - x} = 3.0 \implies 4x^2 = 3.0(0.48 - x) = 1.44 - 3x
4x2+3x−1.44=04x^2 + 3x - 1.44 = 0
Using the quadratic formula x=−b±b2−4ac2ax = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} with a=4a = 4, b=3b = 3, c=−1.44c = -1.44:
x=−3±9−4(4)(−1.44)8=−3±9+23.048=−3±32.048=−3+5.668=2.668=0.3325 barx = \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{9 - 4(4)(-1.44)}}{8} = \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{9 + 23.04}}{8} = \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{32.04}}{8} = \frac{-3 + 5.66}{8} = \frac{2.66}{8} = 0.3325\text{ bar}

Calculating equilibrium partial pressures:

  • pCO=2x=2×0.3325=0.665 barp_{\mathrm{CO}} = 2x = 2 \times 0.3325 = 0.665\text{ bar}
  • pCO2=0.48−0.3325=0.1475 bar≈0.15 barp_{\mathrm{CO}_2} = 0.48 - 0.3325 = 0.1475\text{ bar} \approx 0.15\text{ bar}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Check: (0.665)20.1475=0.44220.1475=2.998≈3.0\frac{(0.665)^2}{0.1475} = \frac{0.4422}{0.1475} = 2.998 \approx 3.0. At 1000 K1000\text{ K}, carbon monoxide is the predominant gas in the presence of carbon.


6.6 Applications of Equilibrium Constants#

The equilibrium constant provides three vital predictive tools for chemical processes:

  1. Predicting the extent of reaction from the magnitude of KK.
  2. Predicting the direction of reaction by evaluating the Reaction Quotient QQ.
  3. Calculating equilibrium concentrations from initial quantities.

6.6.1 Predicting the Extent of a Reaction#

Magnitude of KcK_cPhysical MeaningChemical ExampleDominant Species
Kc>103K_c > 10^3Reaction proceeds virtually to completion.2H2(g)+O2(g)⇌2H2O(g)2\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)}, Kc=2.4×1047K_c = 2.4 \times 10^{47} at 500 K500\text{ K}<br>H2(g)+Cl2(g)⇌2HCl(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{Cl}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HCl}\text{(g)}, Kc=4.0×1031K_c = 4.0 \times 10^{31} at 300 K300\text{ K}Products dominate entirely. Reactants exist in negligible trace amounts.
Kc<10−3K_c < 10^{-3}Reaction barely proceeds in forward direction.N2(g)+O2(g)⇌2NO(g)\mathrm{N}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}\text{(g)}, Kc=4.8×10−31K_c = 4.8 \times 10^{-31} at 298 K298\text{ K}<br>2H2O(g)⇌2H2(g)+O2(g)2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{O}_2\text{(g)}, Kc=4.1×10−48K_c = 4.1 \times 10^{-48} at 500 K500\text{ K}Reactants remain virtually unreacted. Only microscopic product quantities form.
10−3≤Kc≤10310^{-3} \le K_c \le 10^3Appreciable concentrations of both reactants and products exist.H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}\text{(g)}, Kc=57.0K_c = 57.0 at 700 K700\text{ K}<br>N2O4(g)⇌2NO2(g)\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}_2\text{(g)}, Kc=4.64×10−3K_c = 4.64 \times 10^{-3} at 298 K298\text{ K}Both reactants and products coexist in comparable amounts.

6.6.2 Predicting the Direction of Reaction: The Reaction Quotient (QQ)#

For any arbitrary mixture of reactants and products (not necessarily at equilibrium), we define the Reaction Quotient QcQ_c:

Qc=[C]tc[D]td[A]ta[B]tbQ_c = \frac{[\mathrm{C}]_t^c [\mathrm{D}]_t^d}{[\mathrm{A}]_t^a [\mathrm{B}]_t^b}

where subscript tt designates instantaneous concentrations measured at non-equilibrium time tt.

Comparing QcQ_c with the equilibrium constant KcK_c determines the spontaneous direction of the reaction:

ConditionMicroscopic ImplicationNet Direction of Reaction
Qc<KcQ_c < K_cRatio of products to reactants is less than at equilibrium. Forward reaction rate exceeds reverse rate (rf>rrr_f > r_r).Net reaction proceeds from left to right (forward direction) until Qc=KcQ_c = K_c.
Qc>KcQ_c > K_cRatio of products to reactants exceeds equilibrium proportions. Reverse reaction rate exceeds forward rate (rr>rfr_r > r_f).Net reaction proceeds from right to left (reverse direction) until Qc=KcQ_c = K_c.
Qc=KcQ_c = K_cThe system is at dynamic equilibrium (rf=rrr_f = r_r).No net change in macroscopic composition occurs.

NCERT Problem 6.7 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The value of KcK_c for the reaction 2A⇌B+C2\mathrm{A} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{B} + \mathrm{C} is 2×10−32 \times 10^{-3}. At a given time, the composition of the reaction mixture is [A]=[B]=[C]=3×10−4 M[\mathrm{A}] = [\mathrm{B}] = [\mathrm{C}] = 3 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}. In which direction will the reaction proceed?

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • Kc=2×10−3K_c = 2 \times 10^{-3}
  • [A]=3×10−4 M[\mathrm{A}] = 3 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}
  • [B]=3×10−4 M[\mathrm{B}] = 3 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}
  • [C]=3×10−4 M[\mathrm{C}] = 3 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Qc=[B][C][A]2Q_c = \frac{[\mathrm{B}][\mathrm{C}]}{[\mathrm{A}]^2}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Comparison
Qc=(3×10−4)×(3×10−4)(3×10−4)2=1.0Q_c = \frac{(3 \times 10^{-4}) \times (3 \times 10^{-4})}{(3 \times 10^{-4})^2} = 1.0
Comparing QcQ_c and KcK_c:
Qc=1.0>Kc=2×10−3Q_c = 1.0 > K_c = 2 \times 10^{-3}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Because Qc>KcQ_c > K_c, there is an excess of products relative to the equilibrium state. The system will spontaneously proceed in the reverse direction (from right to left), consuming B\mathrm{B} and C\mathrm{C} while producing A\mathrm{A} until QcQ_c drops to 2×10−32 \times 10^{-3}.


NCERT Problem 6.8 (Step-by-Step Solution):
13.8 g13.8\text{ g} of N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 was placed in a 1 L1\text{ L} reaction vessel at 400 K400\text{ K} and allowed to attain equilibrium:
N2O4(g)⇌2NO2(g)\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{NO}_2\text{(g)}
The total pressure at equilibrium was found to be 9.15 bar9.15\text{ bar}. Calculate KcK_c, KpK_p, and the equilibrium partial pressures.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Initial Pressure Calculation

  • Molar mass of N2O4=(2×14.0)+(4×16.0)=92.0 g/mol\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 = (2 \times 14.0) + (4 \times 16.0) = 92.0\text{ g/mol}
  • Initial moles n=13.8 g92.0 g/mol=0.150 moln = \frac{13.8\text{ g}}{92.0\text{ g/mol}} = 0.150\text{ mol}
  • Volume V=1.0 LV = 1.0\text{ L}, T=400 KT = 400\text{ K}, R=0.083 bar L mol−1 K−1R = 0.083\text{ bar L mol}^{-1}\text{ K}^{-1}
  • Initial pressure p0=nRTV=0.150×0.083×4001.0=4.98 barp_0 = \frac{nRT}{V} = \frac{0.150 \times 0.083 \times 400}{1.0} = 4.98\text{ bar}

Step 2: ICE Table in Partial Pressures

ComponentInitial Pressure (bar)Change (bar)Equilibrium Pressure (bar)
N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_44.984.98−x-x4.98−x4.98 - x
NO2\mathrm{NO}_200+2x+2x2x2x

Total pressure at equilibrium:
ptotal=pN2O4+pNO2=(4.98−x)+2x=4.98+x=9.15 barp_{\text{total}} = p_{\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4} + p_{\mathrm{NO}_2} = (4.98 - x) + 2x = 4.98 + x = 9.15\text{ bar}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
x=9.15−4.98=4.17 barx = 9.15 - 4.98 = 4.17\text{ bar}

  • pN2O4=4.98−4.17=0.81 barp_{\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4} = 4.98 - 4.17 = 0.81\text{ bar}
  • pNO2=2×4.17=8.34 barp_{\mathrm{NO}_2} = 2 \times 4.17 = 8.34\text{ bar}

Kp=(pNO2)2pN2O4=(8.34)20.81=69.55560.81=85.87 barK_p = \frac{(p_{\mathrm{NO}_2})^2}{p_{\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4}} = \frac{(8.34)^2}{0.81} = \frac{69.5556}{0.81} = 85.87\text{ bar}

Relating KpK_p to KcK_c with Δng=2−1=1\Delta n_g = 2 - 1 = 1:
Kp=Kc(RT)1  ⟹  Kc=KpRT=85.870.083×400=85.8733.2=2.586≈2.6 mol/LK_p = K_c (RT)^1 \implies K_c = \frac{K_p}{RT} = \frac{85.87}{0.083 \times 400} = \frac{85.87}{33.2} = 2.586 \approx 2.6\text{ mol/L}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Dinitrogen tetroxide undergoes substantial thermal dissociation into nitrogen dioxide at 400 K400\text{ K}, increasing the total number of gaseous particles and generating elevated vessel pressure.


NCERT Problem 6.9 (Step-by-Step Solution):
3.00 mol3.00\text{ mol} of PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_5 kept in a 1 L1\text{ L} closed reaction vessel was allowed to attain equilibrium at 380 K380\text{ K}. Calculate the composition of the mixture at equilibrium if Kc=1.80K_c = 1.80.

Step 1: Given Quantities & ICE Table

  • Initial [PCl5]0=3.00 mol1.0 L=3.00 M[\mathrm{PCl}_5]_0 = \frac{3.00\text{ mol}}{1.0\text{ L}} = 3.00\text{ M}
  • Let xx be the dissociation in mol/L\text{mol/L}:
SpeciesInitial (M)Change (M)Equilibrium (M)
PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_53.003.00−x-x3.00−x3.00 - x
PCl3\mathrm{PCl}_300+x+xxx
Cl2\mathrm{Cl}_200+x+xxx

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Kc=[PCl3][Cl2][PCl5]=x23.00−x=1.80K_c = \frac{[\mathrm{PCl}_3][\mathrm{Cl}_2]}{[\mathrm{PCl}_5]} = \frac{x^2}{3.00 - x} = 1.80

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Quadratic Resolution
x2=1.80(3.00−x)=5.40−1.80x  ⟹  x2+1.80x−5.40=0x^2 = 1.80(3.00 - x) = 5.40 - 1.80x \implies x^2 + 1.80x - 5.40 = 0
Using x=−b±b2−4ac2ax = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}:
x=−1.80±(1.80)2−4(1)(−5.40)2=−1.80±3.24+21.602=−1.80±24.842x = \frac{-1.80 \pm \sqrt{(1.80)^2 - 4(1)(-5.40)}}{2} = \frac{-1.80 \pm \sqrt{3.24 + 21.60}}{2} = \frac{-1.80 \pm \sqrt{24.84}}{2}
24.84≈4.984\sqrt{24.84} \approx 4.984
Taking the positive root:
x=−1.80+4.9842=3.1842=1.592 Mx = \frac{-1.80 + 4.984}{2} = \frac{3.184}{2} = 1.592\text{ M}

Calculating equilibrium concentrations:

  • [PCl5]=3.00−1.59=1.41 M[\mathrm{PCl}_5] = 3.00 - 1.59 = 1.41\text{ M}
  • [PCl3]=[Cl2]=1.59 M[\mathrm{PCl}_3] = [\mathrm{Cl}_2] = 1.59\text{ M}

Step 4: Verification & Chemical Common Sense
Check: (1.59)21.41=2.5281.41=1.793≈1.80\frac{(1.59)^2}{1.41} = \frac{2.528}{1.41} = 1.793 \approx 1.80. Exactly 53%53\% of the initial PCl5\mathrm{PCl}_5 dissociates.


6.7 Relationship between Equilibrium Constant KK, Reaction Quotient QQ, and Gibbs Energy GG#

Thermodynamics provides the fundamental energetic foundation for chemical equilibrium. From classical thermodynamics, the change in Gibbs energy for a reaction mixture at any arbitrary composition is given by:

ΔrG=ΔrG∘+RTln⁡Q\Delta_r G = \Delta_r G^{\circ} + RT \ln Q

where:

  • ΔrG\Delta_r G is the instantaneous Gibbs free energy gradient (driving force).
  • ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^{\circ} is the standard Gibbs energy change when all reactants and products are in their standard states (1 bar1\text{ bar} partial pressure for gases, 1 M1\text{ M} for solutes).
  • QQ is the reaction quotient.

The Physical Condition of Equilibrium#

  1. If ΔrG<0\Delta_r G < 0, the forward reaction is spontaneous and proceeds until free energy is minimized.
  2. If ΔrG>0\Delta_r G > 0, the reverse reaction is spontaneous.
  3. When the system achieves dynamic chemical equilibrium:

ΔrG=0andQ=K\Delta_r G = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad Q = K

Substituting these into the thermodynamic relation:

0=ΔrG∘+RTln⁡K0 = \Delta_r G^{\circ} + RT \ln K

ΔrG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -RT \ln K

Converting natural logarithms to base-10 logarithms:

ΔrG∘=−2.303RTlog⁡10K\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -2.303 RT \log_{10} K

Solving for the equilibrium constant KK:

K=e−ΔrG∘/RTK = e^{-\Delta_r G^{\circ} / RT}

Thermodynamic Interpretation of Reaction Spontaneity#

Standard Gibbs Energy (ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^{\circ})Exponent Term (−ΔrG∘/RT-\Delta_r G^{\circ}/RT)Equilibrium Constant (KK)Thermodynamic Interpretation
ΔrG∘<0\Delta_r G^{\circ} < 0PositiveK>1K > 1Forward reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions. Products predominate at equilibrium.
ΔrG∘>0\Delta_r G^{\circ} > 0NegativeK<1K < 1Forward reaction is non-spontaneous under standard conditions. Reactants predominate at equilibrium.
ΔrG∘=0\Delta_r G^{\circ} = 0ZeroK=1K = 1Standard states coincide with equilibrium proportions.

NCERT Problem 6.10 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The value of ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^{\circ} for the phosphorylation of glucose in glycolysis is +13.8 kJ/mol+13.8\text{ kJ/mol}. Find the value of KcK_c at 298 K298\text{ K}.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • ΔrG∘=+13.8 kJ/mol=+13.8×103 J/mol\Delta_r G^{\circ} = +13.8\text{ kJ/mol} = +13.8 \times 10^3\text{ J/mol}
  • T=298 KT = 298\text{ K}
  • R=8.314 J mol−1 K−1R = 8.314\text{ J mol}^{-1}\text{ K}^{-1}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
ΔrG∘=−RTln⁡Kc  ⟹  ln⁡Kc=−ΔrG∘RT\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -RT \ln K_c \implies \ln K_c = -\frac{\Delta_r G^{\circ}}{RT}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
ln⁡Kc=−13.8×1038.314×298=−138002477.57=−5.570\ln K_c = -\frac{13.8 \times 10^3}{8.314 \times 298} = -\frac{13800}{2477.57} = -5.570
Kc=e−5.570=3.81×10−3K_c = e^{-5.570} = 3.81 \times 10^{-3}

Step 4: Biological Insight
Because ΔrG∘>0\Delta_r G^{\circ} > 0, direct phosphorylation of glucose is endergonic and does not proceed alone. In living cells, this reaction is thermodynamically coupled to the highly exergonic hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP→ADP+Pi\mathrm{ATP} \rightarrow \mathrm{ADP} + \mathrm{P}_i, ΔrG∘≈−30.5 kJ/mol\Delta_r G^{\circ} \approx -30.5\text{ kJ/mol}), making the net combined step spontaneous.


NCERT Problem 6.11 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Hydrolysis of sucrose gives:
Sucrose+H2O⇌Glucose+Fructose\text{Sucrose} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightleftharpoons \text{Glucose} + \text{Fructose}
Equilibrium constant KcK_c for the reaction is 2×10132 \times 10^{13} at 300 K300\text{ K}. Calculate ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^{\circ} at 300 K300\text{ K}.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Unit Harmonization

  • Kc=2×1013K_c = 2 \times 10^{13}
  • T=300 KT = 300\text{ K}
  • R=8.314 J mol−1 K−1R = 8.314\text{ J mol}^{-1}\text{ K}^{-1}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
ΔrG∘=−RTln⁡Kc=−2.303RTlog⁡10Kc\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -RT \ln K_c = -2.303 RT \log_{10} K_c

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
log⁡10(2×1013)=log⁡102+13=0.3010+13=13.3010\log_{10}(2 \times 10^{13}) = \log_{10} 2 + 13 = 0.3010 + 13 = 13.3010
ΔrG∘=−2.303×8.314×300×13.3010\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -2.303 \times 8.314 \times 300 \times 13.3010
2.303×8.314×300=5744.14 J/mol2.303 \times 8.314 \times 300 = 5744.14\text{ J/mol}
ΔrG∘=−5744.14×13.3010=−76403 J/mol=−7.64×104 J/mol=−76.4 kJ/mol\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -5744.14 \times 13.3010 = -76403\text{ J/mol} = -7.64 \times 10^4\text{ J/mol} = -76.4\text{ kJ/mol}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
The large negative ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^{\circ} demonstrates that sucrose hydrolysis is overwhelmingly favored thermodynamically. Table sugar dissolves and hydrolyzes spontaneously, but the reaction requires an enzyme (invertase/sucrase) or acid catalyst to overcome kinetic barriers at room temperature.


6.8 Factors Affecting Equilibria: Le Chatelier's Principle#

When a chemical system reaches dynamic equilibrium, it will maintain its composition indefinitely provided external conditions are kept constant. However, industrial chemical synthesis requires shifting equilibria to maximize product yield.

The qualitative response of an equilibrium system to external perturbation is governed by Le Chatelier's Principle (formulated by French chemist Henri Le Chatelier in 1884):

Le Chatelier's Principle:
If a system at equilibrium is subjected to a change in concentration, temperature, or pressure, the system will shift in such a direction so as to counteract or undo the effect of the imposed disturbance.


6.8.1 Effect of Concentration Change#

When the concentration of any participating species is altered:

  • Adding a substance: The equilibrium shifts in the direction that consumes the added substance.
  • Removing a substance: The equilibrium shifts in the direction that replenishes the removed substance.

Consider the equilibrium:

H2(g)+I2(g)⇌2HI(g)\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} + \mathrm{I}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}\text{(g)}

  1. If extra H2\mathrm{H}_2 gas is injected at equilibrium, [H2][\mathrm{H}_2] increases, making the reaction quotient:

Qc=[HI]2[H2][I2]<KcQ_c = \frac{[\mathrm{HI}]^2}{[\mathrm{H}_2][\mathrm{I}_2]} < K_c

  1. Because Qc<KcQ_c < K_c, a net forward reaction occurs. Additional H2\mathrm{H}_2 and I2\mathrm{I}_2 react to produce HI\mathrm{HI}.
  2. When new equilibrium is restored, the final concentration of H2\mathrm{H}_2 is less than immediately after injection, but greater than in the original mixture, while [I2][\mathrm{I}_2] has decreased and [HI][\mathrm{HI}] has increased.

Industrial Utility of Product Removal

In the manufacture of quicklime (CaO\mathrm{CaO}) from limestone:

CaCO3(s)⇌CaO(s)+CO2(g)\mathrm{CaCO}_3\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CaO}\text{(s)} + \mathrm{CO}_2\text{(g)}

If the reaction were carried out in a closed container, equilibrium would be reached when pCO2=Kpp_{\mathrm{CO}_2} = K_p, stopping further decomposition. In industrial rotary kilns, a continuous draft of air sweeps carbon dioxide out of the kiln flue (pCO2≪Kpp_{\mathrm{CO}_2} \ll K_p), driving decomposition of CaCO3\mathrm{CaCO}_3 to 100% completion.

Laboratory Demonstration: Iron(III) Thiocyanate Complex

The reversible formation of the deep blood-red complex ion:

Fe3+(aq)Pale Yellow+SCN−(aq)Colourless⇌[Fe(SCN)]2+(aq)Deep Blood-Red\underset{\text{Pale Yellow}}{\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}\text{(aq)}} + \underset{\text{Colourless}}{\mathrm{SCN}^-\text{(aq)}} \rightleftharpoons \underset{\text{Deep Blood-Red}}{[\mathrm{Fe(SCN)}]^{2+}\text{(aq)}}

Kc=[[Fe(SCN)]2+][Fe3+][SCN−]K_c = \frac{[[\mathrm{Fe(SCN)}]^{2+}]}{[\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}][\mathrm{SCN}^-]}

Perturbation ReagentChemical MechanismDirection of ShiftVisual Color Change
Add Fe(NO3)3\mathrm{Fe(NO}_3)_3Increases [Fe3+][\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}], making Qc<KcQ_c < K_c.Shifts forward to consume excess Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}.Red color intensifies dramatically.
Add KSCN\mathrm{KSCN}Increases [SCN−][\mathrm{SCN}^-], making Qc<KcQ_c < K_c.Shifts forward to consume excess SCN−\mathrm{SCN}^-.Red color intensifies dramatically.
Add Oxalic Acid (H2C2O4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{O}_4)Oxalate ions bind free Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+} into stable [Fe(C2O4)3]3−[\mathrm{Fe(C}_2\mathrm{O}_4)_3]^{3-} complex, depleting free [Fe3+][\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}].Shifts reverse to replenish lost Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}.Red color fades back to pale yellow.
Add Mercury(II) Chloride (HgCl2\mathrm{HgCl}_2)Hg2+\mathrm{Hg}^{2+} binds free SCN−\mathrm{SCN}^- into stable [Hg(SCN)4]2−[\mathrm{Hg(SCN)}_4]^{2-} complex, depleting [SCN−][\mathrm{SCN}^-].Shifts reverse to replenish lost SCN−\mathrm{SCN}^-.Red color fades completely to colourless/yellow.

6.8.2 Effect of Pressure and Volume Change#

Because liquids and solids are virtually incompressible, changes in pressure have negligible effects on heterogeneous systems containing only condensed phases. For gaseous equilibria, pressure changes obtained by altering the container volume have substantial effects whenever Δng≠0\Delta n_g \neq 0.

Consider the industrial methanation reaction:

CO(g)+3H2(g)⇌CH4(g)+H2O(g)\mathrm{CO}\text{(g)} + 3\mathrm{H}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_4\text{(g)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(g)}

  • Reactant gas moles: 1+3=4 moles1 + 3 = 4\text{ moles}
  • Product gas moles: 1+1=2 moles1 + 1 = 2\text{ moles}
  • Change in gas moles: Δng=2−4=−2\Delta n_g = 2 - 4 = -2

If the volume of the reaction container is halved at constant temperature, Boyle's Law dictates that total pressure doubles, and every individual concentration doubles (c′=2cc' = 2c).

The new reaction quotient is:

Qc=[2CH4][2H2O][2CO][2H2]3=416⋅[CH4][H2O][CO][H2]3=14KcQ_c = \frac{[2\mathrm{CH}_4][2\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}]}{[2\mathrm{CO}][2\mathrm{H}_2]^3} = \frac{4}{16} \cdot \frac{[\mathrm{CH}_4][\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}]}{[\mathrm{CO}][\mathrm{H}_2]^3} = \frac{1}{4} K_c

Because Qc=14Kc<KcQ_c = \frac{1}{4}K_c < K_c, the forward reaction proceeds preferentially. The equilibrium shifts in the forward direction, which contains fewer gaseous molecules (22 vs 44), thereby decreasing internal pressure and counteracting the applied compression.

General Rule for Pressure Changes:

  • Increasing pressure (compressing volume) shifts the equilibrium toward the side with fewer moles of gas.
  • Decreasing pressure (expanding volume) shifts the equilibrium toward the side with more moles of gas.
  • If Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0 (such as H2+I2⇌2HI\mathrm{H}_2 + \mathrm{I}_2 \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{HI}), pressure changes have zero effect on the equilibrium composition.

6.8.3 Effect of Inert Gas Addition#

When an inert gas (such as argon, helium, or neon) that does not participate chemically is introduced into an equilibrium vessel:

  1. Addition at Constant Volume (V=constantV = \text{constant}):
    Total pressure increases due to additional non-reactive atoms. However, because volume and temperature are fixed, the partial pressure and molar concentration of each reacting gas (pi=niRTVp_i = \frac{n_i RT}{V}, [i]=niV[i] = \frac{n_i}{V}) remain strictly unchanged. Therefore, QcQ_c remains equal to KcK_c, and the equilibrium position is completely undisturbed.
  2. Addition at Constant Pressure (p=constantp = \text{constant}):
    To accommodate the inert gas while maintaining constant pressure, the container volume must expand. This expansion decreases the partial pressures of all reacting gases. The system responds as if subjected to an overall pressure decrease, shifting toward the side with the larger number of gaseous moles (if Δng>0\Delta n_g > 0, shifts forward; if Δng<0\Delta n_g < 0, shifts reverse).

6.8.4 Effect of Temperature Change#

Perturbations of concentration, pressure, or volume alter the reaction quotient QcQ_c, causing the system to shift until QcQ_c matches an invariant KcK_c. In contrast, a change in temperature alters the numerical value of the equilibrium constant KK itself.

The temperature dependence of KK is governed by the sign of the standard enthalpy of reaction ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^{\circ}, as formalized by the van 't Hoff equation:

ln⁡(K2K1)=ΔrH∘R(1T1−1T2)\ln \left(\frac{K_2}{K_1}\right) = \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{R} \left(\frac{1}{T_1} - \frac{1}{T_2}\right)

Reaction ThermodynamicsSign of ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^{\circ}Effect of Increasing TemperatureEffect of Decreasing Temperature
Exothermic ReactionΔrH∘<0\Delta_r H^{\circ} < 0 (Heat is released as a product)Equilibrium constant decreases (K↓K \downarrow). Shifts in reverse direction (toward reactants).Equilibrium constant increases (K↑K \uparrow). Shifts in forward direction (toward products).
Endothermic ReactionΔrH∘>0\Delta_r H^{\circ} > 0 (Heat is absorbed as a reactant)Equilibrium constant increases (K↑K \uparrow). Shifts in forward direction (toward products).Equilibrium constant decreases (K↓K \downarrow). Shifts in reverse direction (toward reactants).

Experimental Demonstration: Nitrogen Dioxide Dimerization

Consider the dimerization of brown nitrogen dioxide into colorless dinitrogen tetroxide:

2NO2(g)⇌N2O4(g),ΔrH∘=−57.2 kJ/mol (Exothermic)2\mathrm{NO}_2\text{(g)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4\text{(g)}, \quad \Delta_r H^{\circ} = -57.2\text{ kJ/mol (Exothermic)}

Two sealed test tubes containing identical amounts of brown NO2\mathrm{NO}_2 gas are prepared:

  • Tube 1 is placed in a freezing bath at 270 K270\text{ K} (0∘C0^{\circ}\text{C}). Cooling favors the forward exothermic reaction. The deep brown color fades, turning nearly colourless as N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 forms.
  • Tube 2 is placed in a boiling water bath at 363 K363\text{ K} (90∘C90^{\circ}\text{C}). Heating drives the reverse endothermic reaction. The gas darkens into an intense reddish-brown color as N2O4\mathrm{N}_2\mathrm{O}_4 dissociates into NO2\mathrm{NO}_2.

Endothermic Demonstration: Cobalt Chloride Hexahydrate

[Co(H2O)6]2+(aq)Pink+4Cl−(aq)⇌[CoCl4]2−(aq)Deep Blue+6H2O(l),ΔrH∘>0\underset{\text{Pink}}{[\mathrm{Co(H}_2\mathrm{O})_6]^{2+}\text{(aq)}} + 4\mathrm{Cl}^-\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons \underset{\text{Deep Blue}}{[\mathrm{CoCl}_4]^{2-}\text{(aq)}} + 6\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}, \quad \Delta_r H^{\circ} > 0

  • At room temperature, the solution is blue-violet.
  • When placed in an ice bath, it shifts in the reverse exothermic direction, turning distinctly pink.
  • When heated over a burner, it shifts forward in the endothermic direction, turning vivid deep blue.

6.8.5 Effect of a Catalyst#

A catalyst accelerates a chemical transformation by providing an alternative reaction pathway with a lower activation energy (EaE_a).

Key features of catalysts in equilibrium systems:

  1. A catalyst lowers the activation energy of the forward reaction (Ea,fE_{a,f}) and reverse reaction (Ea,rE_{a,r}) by the exact same numerical amount:

ΔEa=Ea,fcat−Ea,funcat=Ea,rcat−Ea,runcat\Delta E_a = E_{a,f}^{\text{cat}} - E_{a,f}^{\text{uncat}} = E_{a,r}^{\text{cat}} - E_{a,r}^{\text{uncat}}

  1. Consequently, the forward and reverse rate constants are accelerated by the exact same multiplier:

kfcatkfuncat=krcatkruncat\frac{k_f^{\text{cat}}}{k_f^{\text{uncat}}} = \frac{k_r^{\text{cat}}}{k_r^{\text{uncat}}}

  1. The equilibrium constant is the quotient of these rate constants:

Kc=kfkr=kfcatkrcatK_c = \frac{k_f}{k_r} = \frac{k_f^{\text{cat}}}{k_r^{\text{cat}}}

Therefore, a catalyst does not alter the numerical value of KcK_c, nor does it shift the equilibrium position or change product yield.

A catalyst merely accelerates the rate at which the dynamic equilibrium state is achieved. In industrial processes where reactions have high activation barriers (such as the contact process for sulphuric acid, 2SO2+O2⇌2SO32\mathrm{SO}_2 + \mathrm{O}_2 \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{SO}_3 with a V2O5\mathrm{V}_2\mathrm{O}_5 catalyst, or the Haber process with iron), catalysts allow commercial production rates at moderate operating temperatures.

Interactive Simulation Experiment: Le Chatelier Dashboard & Catalyst Race
Open the Le Chatelier tab in the simulation suite:

  1. Select the Concentration (Iron-Thiocyanate) module. Click Add Oxalic Acid. Observe the red complex concentration drop as Fe3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+} is scavenged. Click Add KSCN to watch the red color recover.
  2. Select the Gas Piston module. Drag the cylinder volume slider from 2.0 L2.0\text{ L} down to 0.8 L0.8\text{ L}. Watch the system compress and shift toward fewer moles.
  3. Switch to the Thermal Bath module. Drag the temperature slider from 273 K273\text{ K} to 370 K370\text{ K}. Observe the test tube color shift from pale to intense brown.
  4. In the Reaction Tank tab, toggle Add Catalyst. Observe both reaction paths accelerate, reaching the plateau 10 times faster, while the final concentrations remain unchanged.

6.9 Ionic Equilibrium in Solution#

In 1834, Michael Faraday discovered that chemical substances can be divided into two classes based on their electrical conductivity in aqueous solution:

  1. Electrolytes: Substances whose aqueous solutions conduct an electric current (acids, bases, salts).
  2. Non-electrolytes: Substances whose aqueous solutions do not conduct electricity (aqueous sucrose, urea, glycerol).

Faraday further classified electrolytes into two categories:

  • Strong Electrolytes: Dissociate almost completely (100%100\% ionization) into ions upon dissolution in water. Examples: HCl,HNO3,H2SO4,NaOH,KOH,NaCl\mathrm{HCl}, \mathrm{HNO}_3, \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4, \mathrm{NaOH}, \mathrm{KOH}, \mathrm{NaCl}.
  • Weak Electrolytes: Ionize only partially in aqueous solution, leaving most solute molecules un-ionized. Examples: CH3COOH,HF,HCN,NH3,NH4OH\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}, \mathrm{HF}, \mathrm{HCN}, \mathrm{NH}_3, \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{OH}.

In weak electrolytes, a dynamic equilibrium operates between the un-ionized neutral molecules and the generated ions:

CH3COOH(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3COO−(aq)+H3O+(aq)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)}

This equilibrium involving ions in aqueous solution is defined as ionic equilibrium.

Water facilitates ionic dissociation because of its high dielectric constant (ϵr≈80\epsilon_r \approx 80 at 298 K298\text{ K}). According to Coulomb's law:

F=q1q24πε0εrr2F = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_r r^2}

The electrostatic force holding oppositely charged ions together within a crystal lattice is reduced by a factor of 80 when immersed in water, while exothermic ion hydration stabilizes the separated ions.


6.10 Acids, Bases, and Salts#

Three successive theoretical frameworks describe acid-base behavior:

CharacteristicArrhenius Concept (1884)Brönsted-Lowry Concept (1923)Lewis Concept (1923)
Acid DefinitionSubstance that produces hydrogen ions (H+\mathrm{H}^+) in aqueous solution.Substance capable of donating a proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+ donor).Species capable of accepting an electron pair (electron pair acceptor).
Base DefinitionSubstance that produces hydroxide ions (OH−\mathrm{OH}^-) in aqueous solution.Substance capable of accepting a proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+ acceptor).Species capable of donating an electron pair (electron pair donor).
Medium RequirementStrictly restricted to aqueous solution.Independent of aqueous solvent; applies to gas and non-aqueous media.Universal; requires neither protons nor solvents.
LimitationsCannot account for the basicity of ammonia (NH3\mathrm{NH}_3) or pyridine, which lack OH−\mathrm{OH}^- groups.Excludes acid-base transformations occurring without proton transfer (e.g. BF3+NH3\mathrm{BF}_3 + \mathrm{NH}_3).Very broad; encompasses coordination chemistry and complexation.

6.10.1 The Hydronium Ion (mathrmH3mathrmO+mathrm{H}_3mathrm{O}^+)#

A bare proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+) is an unshielded atomic nucleus with a radius of only ≈10−15 m\approx 10^{-15}\text{ m}, creating an intense electric field (1010 V/m10^{10}\text{ V/m}). A bare proton cannot exist independently in aqueous solution.

It immediately binds to a lone pair on a water molecule to form the trigonal pyramidal hydronium ion:

H++H2O→H3O+\mathrm{H}^+ + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightarrow \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+

In liquid water, hydronium is hydrated further into extended hydrogen-bonded clusters:

H5O2+,H7O3+,H9O4+\mathrm{H}_5\mathrm{O}_2^+, \quad \mathrm{H}_7\mathrm{O}_3^+, \quad \mathrm{H}_9\mathrm{O}_4^+

Similarly, hydroxide is hydrated into species such as H3O2−\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}_2^- and H7O4−\mathrm{H}_7\mathrm{O}_4^-. In this text, H+(aq)\mathrm{H}^+\text{(aq)} and H3O+(aq)\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} are used interchangeably to represent hydrated protons.


6.10.2 Brönsted-Lowry Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs#

According to the Brönsted-Lowry definition, an acid donates a proton to a base. In the reverse direction, the resulting species can transfer a proton back:

NH3(aq)Base 1+H2O(l)Acid 2⇌NH4+(aq)Conjugate Acid 1+OH−(aq)Conjugate Base 2\underset{\text{Base 1}}{\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(aq)}} + \underset{\text{Acid 2}}{\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}} \rightleftharpoons \underset{\text{Conjugate Acid 1}}{\mathrm{NH}_4^+\text{(aq)}} + \underset{\text{Conjugate Base 2}}{\mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}}

HCl(aq)Acid 1+H2O(l)Base 2⇌H3O+(aq)Conjugate Acid 2+Cl−(aq)Conjugate Base 1\underset{\text{Acid 1}}{\mathrm{HCl}\text{(aq)}} + \underset{\text{Base 2}}{\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}} \rightleftharpoons \underset{\text{Conjugate Acid 2}}{\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)}} + \underset{\text{Conjugate Base 1}}{\mathrm{Cl}^-\text{(aq)}}

Definition: Conjugate Acid-Base Pair
A pair of chemical species that differ from each other by exactly one proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+).

  • Conjugate Base=Acid−H+\text{Conjugate Base} = \text{Acid} - \mathrm{H}^+
  • Conjugate Acid=Base+H+\text{Conjugate Acid} = \text{Base} + \mathrm{H}^+

Strength Principle:
A strong Brönsted acid has a very weak conjugate base. Conversely, a weak Brönsted acid has a relatively strong conjugate base.

Amphiprotic / Amphoteric Nature of Water

Water can act as both a Brönsted acid and a Brönsted base depending on the reaction partner:

  • When reacting with HCl\mathrm{HCl}, water accepts a proton, acting as a base: conjugate acid is H3O+\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+.
  • When reacting with NH3\mathrm{NH}_3, water donates a proton, acting as an acid: conjugate base is OH−\mathrm{OH}^-.

NCERT Problem 6.12 (Step-by-Step Solution):
What will be the conjugate bases for the following Brönsted acids: HF\mathrm{HF}, H2SO4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4, and HCO3−\mathrm{HCO}_3^-?

Step 1: Governing Principle
A conjugate base is formed by removing exactly one proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+) from the parent acid.

Step 2: Systematic Deduction

  • For HF\mathrm{HF}: HF−H+→F−\mathrm{HF} - \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{F}^- (Fluoride ion)
  • For H2SO4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4: H2SO4−H+→HSO4−\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 - \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{HSO}_4^- (Hydrogen sulphate / bisulphate ion)
  • For HCO3−\mathrm{HCO}_3^-: HCO3−−H+→CO32−\mathrm{HCO}_3^- - \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{CO}_3^{2-} (Carbonate ion)

NCERT Problem 6.13 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Write the conjugate acids for the following Brönsted bases: NH2−\mathrm{NH}_2^-, NH3\mathrm{NH}_3, and HCOO−\mathrm{HCOO}^-.

Step 1: Governing Principle
A conjugate acid is formed by adding exactly one proton (H+\mathrm{H}^+) to the parent base.

Step 2: Systematic Deduction

  • For NH2−\mathrm{NH}_2^-: NH2−+H+→NH3\mathrm{NH}_2^- + \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{NH}_3 (Ammonia)
  • For NH3\mathrm{NH}_3: NH3+H+→NH4+\mathrm{NH}_3 + \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{NH}_4^+ (Ammonium ion)
  • For HCOO−\mathrm{HCOO}^-: HCOO−+H+→HCOOH\mathrm{HCOO}^- + \mathrm{H}^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{HCOOH} (Formic acid / methanoic acid)

NCERT Problem 6.14 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The species: H2O\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}, HCO3−\mathrm{HCO}_3^-, HSO4−\mathrm{HSO}_4^-, and NH3\mathrm{NH}_3 can act both as Brönsted acids and bases. For each case, give the corresponding conjugate acid and conjugate base.

Step 1: Governing Principle

  • Conjugate Acid =Species+H+= \text{Species} + \mathrm{H}^+
  • Conjugate Base =Species−H+= \text{Species} - \mathrm{H}^+

Step 2: Systematic Tabulation

Amphiprotic SpeciesConjugate Acid (+H+H^+)Conjugate Base (-H+H^+)
H2O\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}H3O+\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+ (Hydronium ion)OH−\mathrm{OH}^- (Hydroxide ion)
HCO3−\mathrm{HCO}_3^-H2CO3\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{CO}_3 (Carbonic acid)CO32−\mathrm{CO}_3^{2-} (Carbonate ion)
HSO4−\mathrm{HSO}_4^-H2SO4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 (Sulphuric acid)SO42−\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-} (Sulphate ion)
NH3\mathrm{NH}_3NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+ (Ammonium ion)NH2−\mathrm{NH}_2^- (Amide ion)

NCERT Problem 6.15 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Classify the following species into Lewis acids and Lewis bases and show how these act as such: (a) HO−\mathrm{HO}^-, (b) F−\mathrm{F}^-, (c) H+\mathrm{H}^+, (d) BCl3\mathrm{BCl}_3.

Step 1: Governing Principle
A Lewis acid has an incomplete octet or vacant orbital to accept an electron pair. A Lewis base possesses at least one unshared lone pair of electrons available for donation.

Step 2: Systematic Deduction

  • (a) HO−\mathrm{HO}^-: Lewis Base. The oxygen atom possesses three lone pairs (:O¨H−:\ddot{\mathrm{O}}\mathrm{H}^-) and can donate an electron pair to electrophiles.
  • (b) F−\mathrm{F}^-: Lewis Base. The fluoride ion has a complete octet with four lone pairs (:F¨:−:\ddot{\mathrm{F}}:^-) available for coordination.
  • (c) H+\mathrm{H}^+: Lewis Acid. A bare proton has an empty 1s1s orbital capable of accommodating an electron pair (as in H++:NH3→NH4+\mathrm{H}^+ + :\mathrm{NH}_3 \rightarrow \mathrm{NH}_4^+).
  • (d) BCl3\mathrm{BCl}_3: Lewis Acid. Boron has only six valence electrons (incomplete octet) and an empty 2p2p orbital that readily accepts a lone pair from ammonia or amines.

6.11 Ionization of Acids and Bases#

6.11.1 The Autoionization of Water and Its Ionic Product (KwK_w)#

Pure water is an extremely weak electrolyte that undergoes self-ionization (autoprotolysis):

H2O(l)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+OH−(aq)\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}

The equilibrium constant is:

K=[H3O+][OH−][H2O]2K = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}]^2}

Because water is present in vast excess, its molar concentration is effectively constant. For pure water at 298 K298\text{ K} with density 1000 g/L1000\text{ g/L} and molar mass 18.02 g/mol18.02\text{ g/mol}:

[H2O]=1000 g/L18.02 g/mol=55.55 mol/L[\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}] = \frac{1000\text{ g/L}}{18.02\text{ g/mol}} = 55.55\text{ mol/L}

Incorporating this constant concentration into KK yields the ionic product of water (KwK_w):

Kw=[H3O+][OH−]=[H+][OH−]K_w = [\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-] = [\mathrm{H}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]

At 298 K298\text{ K} (25∘C25^{\circ}\text{C}), conductivity measurements establish:

[H+]=[OH−]=1.0×10−7 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = [\mathrm{OH}^-] = 1.0 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M}

Kw=(1.0×10−7)×(1.0×10−7)=1.0×10−14 M2K_w = (1.0 \times 10^{-7}) \times (1.0 \times 10^{-7}) = 1.0 \times 10^{-14}\text{ M}^2

The fraction of ionized water molecules is:

1.0×10−7 M55.55 M≈1.8×10−9(roughly 2 molecules out of every billion)\frac{1.0 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M}}{55.55\text{ M}} \approx 1.8 \times 10^{-9} \quad (\text{roughly } 2 \text{ molecules out of every billion})

Temperature Dependence of KwK_w

Because autoionization is an endothermic bond-cleaving process:

2H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+OH−(aq),ΔH>02\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}, \quad \Delta H > 0

Increasing the temperature shifts the equilibrium forward, increasing KwK_w:

  • At 298 K298\text{ K} (25∘C25^{\circ}\text{C}): Kw=1.0×10−14  ⟹  [H+]=1.0×10−7 M  ⟹  pH=7.00K_w = 1.0 \times 10^{-14} \implies [\mathrm{H}^+] = 1.0 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M} \implies \text{pH} = 7.00
  • At 310 K310\text{ K} (37∘C37^{\circ}\text{C}, body temperature): Kw=2.7×10−14  ⟹  [H+]=2.7×10−14=1.64×10−7 M  ⟹  pH=6.78K_w = 2.7 \times 10^{-14} \implies [\mathrm{H}^+] = \sqrt{2.7 \times 10^{-14}} = 1.64 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M} \implies \text{pH} = 6.78
  • At 373 K373\text{ K} (100∘C100^{\circ}\text{C}): Kw≈5.13×10−13  ⟹  [H+]=7.16×10−7 M  ⟹  pH=6.14K_w \approx 5.13 \times 10^{-13} \implies [\mathrm{H}^+] = 7.16 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M} \implies \text{pH} = 6.14

Even though the pH\text{pH} of neutral water at 100∘C100^{\circ}\text{C} is 6.146.14, the water is not acidic because [H+]=[OH−][\mathrm{H}^+] = [\mathrm{OH}^-] remains strictly satisfied. The neutral point shifts with temperature:

ClassificationRelative Ion Concentration
Acidic Solution[H3O+]>[OH−][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] > [\mathrm{OH}^-]
Neutral Solution[H3O+]=[OH−][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] = [\mathrm{OH}^-]
Basic Solution[H3O+]<[OH−][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] < [\mathrm{OH}^-]

6.11.2 The pH Scale#

In 1909, Danish biochemist Søren P. L. Sørensen introduced the logarithmic pH scale to represent hydrogen ion concentrations:

pH=−log⁡10aH+≈−log⁡10([H+]1 mol/L)\text{pH} = -\log_{10} a_{\mathrm{H}^+} \approx -\log_{10} \left(\frac{[\mathrm{H}^+]}{1\text{ mol/L}}\right)

Similarly, for hydroxide ions:

pOH=−log⁡10[OH−]\text{pOH} = -\log_{10} [\mathrm{OH}^-]

Taking the negative logarithm of the water autoionization expression:

Kw=[H+][OH−]=1.0×10−14K_w = [\mathrm{H}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-] = 1.0 \times 10^{-14}

−log⁡Kw=−log⁡[H+]−log⁡[OH−]=−log⁡(10−14)-\log K_w = -\log [\mathrm{H}^+] - \log [\mathrm{OH}^-] = -\log(10^{-14})

pKw=pH+pOH=14.00(at 298 K)\text{pK}_w = \text{pH} + \text{pOH} = 14.00 \quad (\text{at } 298\text{ K})

Because the scale is logarithmic:

  • A change of 1 pH unit1\text{ pH unit} corresponds to a 10-fold10\text{-fold} change in [H+][\mathrm{H}^+].
  • A change of 2 pH units2\text{ pH units} corresponds to a 100-fold100\text{-fold} change in [H+][\mathrm{H}^+].

Common Solution pH Values (NCERT Table 6.5)

Substance / FluidApproximate pHClassification
Concentrated HCl\mathrm{HCl}≈−1.0\approx -1.0Strongly Acidic
1 M HCl1\text{ M HCl} solution≈0.0\approx 0.0Strongly Acidic
Gastric juice (human stomach)1.21.2Strongly Acidic
Lemon juice2.22.2Acidic
Vinegar and Soft drinks3.03.0Acidic
Tomato juice4.24.2Moderately Acidic
Black coffee5.05.0Weakly Acidic
Human saliva6.46.4Slightly Acidic
Fresh milk6.86.8Slightly Acidic
Pure neutral water at 298 K298\text{ K}7.07.0Neutral
Human blood7.38−7.427.38 - 7.42Slightly Alkaline
Egg white and sea water7.87.8Weakly Alkaline
Milk of magnesia (suspension of Mg(OH)2\mathrm{Mg(OH)}_2)10.010.0Alkaline
Saturated lime water (Ca(OH)2\mathrm{Ca(OH)}_2)10.510.5Alkaline
0.1 M NaOH0.1\text{ M NaOH} solution13.013.0Strongly Alkaline
Saturated NaOH\mathrm{NaOH} solution≈15.0\approx 15.0Strongly Alkaline

NCERT Problem 6.16 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The concentration of hydrogen ion in a sample of soft drink is 3.8×10−3 M3.8 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}. What is its pH\text{pH}?

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • [H+]=3.8×10−3 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = 3.8 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
pH=−log⁡10[H+]\text{pH} = -\log_{10}[\mathrm{H}^+]

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Logarithmic Computation
pH=−log⁡10(3.8×10−3)=−[log⁡103.8+log⁡10(10−3)]\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(3.8 \times 10^{-3}) = -[\log_{10} 3.8 + \log_{10}(10^{-3})]
log⁡103.8≈0.5798\log_{10} 3.8 \approx 0.5798
pH=−[0.5798−3.0]=−[−2.4202]=2.42\text{pH} = -[0.5798 - 3.0] = -[-2.4202] = 2.42

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
A pH\text{pH} of 2.422.42 indicates substantial acidity, resulting from dissolved carbonic acid and added acidulants like phosphoric or citric acid.


NCERT Problem 6.17 (The Ultra-Dilute Acid Paradox):
Calculate the pH\text{pH} of a 1.0×10−8 M1.0 \times 10^{-8}\text{ M} solution of HCl\mathrm{HCl}.

Step 1: Common Misconception and Physical Analysis
Applying the naive definition pH=−log⁡(10−8)=8\text{pH} = -\log(10^{-8}) = 8 suggests that adding an acid to neutral water produces an alkaline solution (extpH>7 ext{pH} > 7), which violates physical reality.
In ultra-dilute acidic solutions (c≤10−6 Mc \le 10^{-6}\text{ M}), the autoionization of water cannot be neglected, because pure water itself contributes 10−7 M H+10^{-7}\text{ M } \mathrm{H}^+.

Step 2: Governing Simultaneous Equilibria

  1. HCl→H++Cl−\mathrm{HCl} \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^+ + \mathrm{Cl}^- (complete dissociation contributes 10−8 M H+10^{-8}\text{ M } \mathrm{H}^+)
  2. H2O⇌H++OH−\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}^+ + \mathrm{OH}^- (let water ionization produce x M H+x\text{ M } \mathrm{H}^+ and x M OH−x\text{ M } \mathrm{OH}^-)

Total hydronium concentration:
[H+]=10−8+x,[OH−]=x[\mathrm{H}^+] = 10^{-8} + x, \quad [\mathrm{OH}^-] = x
Kw=[H+][OH−]=(10−8+x)x=1.0×10−14K_w = [\mathrm{H}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-] = (10^{-8} + x)x = 1.0 \times 10^{-14}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Quadratic Resolution
x2+10−8x−10−14=0x^2 + 10^{-8}x - 10^{-14} = 0
Using the quadratic formula:
x=−10−8+10−16−4(1)(−10−14)2=−10−8+10−16+4×10−142x = \frac{-10^{-8} + \sqrt{10^{-16} - 4(1)(-10^{-14})}}{2} = \frac{-10^{-8} + \sqrt{10^{-16} + 4 \times 10^{-14}}}{2}
4.01×10−14≈2.0025×10−7\sqrt{4.01 \times 10^{-14}} \approx 2.0025 \times 10^{-7}
x=−0.10×10−7+2.0025×10−72=1.9025×10−72=0.951×10−7 M=[OH−]x = \frac{-0.10 \times 10^{-7} + 2.0025 \times 10^{-7}}{2} = \frac{1.9025 \times 10^{-7}}{2} = 0.951 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M} = [\mathrm{OH}^-]

Total [H+][\mathrm{H}^+]:
[H+]=10−8+0.951×10−7=0.10×10−7+0.951×10−7=1.051×10−7 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = 10^{-8} + 0.951 \times 10^{-7} = 0.10 \times 10^{-7} + 0.951 \times 10^{-7} = 1.051 \times 10^{-7}\text{ M}
pH=−log⁡10(1.051×10−7)=7−log⁡10(1.051)=7−0.0216=6.98\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(1.051 \times 10^{-7}) = 7 - \log_{10}(1.051) = 7 - 0.0216 = 6.98

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
The calculated pH=6.98\text{pH} = 6.98 is slightly acidic (extpH<7 ext{pH} < 7), consistent with adding a trace quantity of strong acid to neutral water.


6.11.3 Ionization Constants of Weak Acids (KaK_a) and Ostwald's Dilution Law#

Consider a monoprotic weak acid HX\mathrm{HX} dissolving in water at initial concentration c (mol/L)c\text{ (mol/L)}. Let α\alpha represent the degree of ionization (the fraction of acid molecules that dissociate):

HX(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+X−(aq)\mathrm{HX}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{X}^-\text{(aq)}

ComponentInitial ConcentrationChangeEquilibrium Concentration
HX\mathrm{HX}cc−cα-c\alphac(1−α)c(1 - \alpha)
H3O+\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+00+cα+c\alphacαc\alpha
X−\mathrm{X}^-00+cα+c\alphacαc\alpha

The acid ionization constant is:

Ka=[H3O+][X−][HX]=(cα)(cα)c(1−α)=cα21−αK_a = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{X}^-]}{[\mathrm{HX}]} = \frac{(c\alpha)(c\alpha)}{c(1 - \alpha)} = \frac{c\alpha^2}{1 - \alpha}

For very weak electrolytes where α≪1\alpha \ll 1 (typically α<0.05\alpha < 0.05 or 5%5\%), the approximation 1−α≈11 - \alpha \approx 1 holds:

Ka≈cα2  ⟹  α=KacK_a \approx c\alpha^2 \implies \alpha = \sqrt{\frac{K_a}{c}}

This relation is Ostwald's Dilution Law:

  • The degree of ionization α\alpha is inversely proportional to the square root of concentration: α∝1c\alpha \propto \frac{1}{\sqrt{c}}.
  • As an acidic solution is diluted with water (c→0c \rightarrow 0), α\alpha increases, approaching 1.01.0 (100%100\% ionization) at infinite dilution.

The hydronium concentration in terms of KaK_a:

[H+]=cα=cKac=Ka⋅c[\mathrm{H}^+] = c\alpha = c \sqrt{\frac{K_a}{c}} = \sqrt{K_a \cdot c}

pH=12(pKa−log⁡10c)\text{pH} = \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_a - \log_{10} c)

where pKa=−log⁡10Ka\text{pK}_a = -\log_{10} K_a. A larger KaK_a (or smaller pKa\text{pK}_a) corresponds to a stronger acid.


6.11.4 Ionization Constants of Weak Bases (KbK_b)#

For a weak molecular base B\mathrm{B} or metal hydroxide MOH\mathrm{MOH}:

B(aq)+H2O(l)⇌BH+(aq)+OH−(aq)\mathrm{B}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{BH}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}

Kb=[BH+][OH−][B]=cα21−αK_b = \frac{[\mathrm{BH}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{B}]} = \frac{c\alpha^2}{1 - \alpha}

When α≤0.05\alpha \le 0.05:

α≈Kbc,[OH−]=cα=Kb⋅c\alpha \approx \sqrt{\frac{K_b}{c}}, \quad [\mathrm{OH}^-] = c\alpha = \sqrt{K_b \cdot c}

pOH=12(pKb−log⁡10c),pH=14−pOH\text{pOH} = \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_b - \log_{10} c), \quad \text{pH} = 14 - \text{pOH}

where pKb=−log⁡10Kb\text{pK}_b = -\log_{10} K_b.


6.11.5 Relation between KaK_a and KbK_b of a Conjugate Acid-Base Pair#

Consider the weak base ammonia NH3\mathrm{NH}_3 and its conjugate acid, the ammonium ion NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+:

  1. Base ionization of NH3\mathrm{NH}_3:

NH3(aq)+H2O(l)⇌NH4+(aq)+OH−(aq),Kb=[NH4+][OH−][NH3]\mathrm{NH}_3\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}, \quad K_b = \frac{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{NH}_3]}

  1. Acid ionization of conjugate acid NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+:

NH4+(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+NH3(aq),Ka=[H3O+][NH3][NH4+]\mathrm{NH}_4^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{NH}_3\text{(aq)}, \quad K_a = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{NH}_3]}{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+]}

Multiplying the two equilibrium expressions:

Ka×Kb=([H3O+][NH3][NH4+])×([NH4+][OH−][NH3])=[H3O+][OH−]=KwK_a \times K_b = \left(\frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{NH}_3]}{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+]}\right) \times \left(\frac{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{NH}_3]}\right) = [\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-] = K_w

Ka×Kb=KwK_a \times K_b = K_w

Taking negative logarithms:

pKa+pKb=pKw=14.00(at 298 K)\text{pK}_a + \text{pK}_b = \text{pK}_w = 14.00 \quad (\text{at } 298\text{ K})

This relationship confirms that knowing either KaK_a or KbK_b for one partner in a conjugate pair allows immediate calculation of the other.


NCERT Problem 6.18 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The ionization constant of HF\mathrm{HF} is 3.2×10−43.2 \times 10^{-4}. Calculate the degree of dissociation of HF\mathrm{HF} in its 0.02 M0.02\text{ M} solution. Calculate the concentration of all species present ([H3O+][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+], [F−][\mathrm{F}^-], and [HF][\mathrm{HF}]) in the solution and its pH\text{pH}.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • c=0.02 Mc = 0.02\text{ M}
  • Ka=3.2×10−4K_a = 3.2 \times 10^{-4}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Ka=cα21−αK_a = \frac{c\alpha^2}{1 - \alpha}
Testing approximate formula: α≈3.2×10−40.02=1.6×10−2=0.126=12.6%\alpha \approx \sqrt{\frac{3.2 \times 10^{-4}}{0.02}} = \sqrt{1.6 \times 10^{-2}} = 0.126 = 12.6\%.
Since α>0.05\alpha > 0.05, the approximation 1−α≈11 - \alpha \approx 1 is invalid; we must solve the exact quadratic equation.

Step 3: Quadratic Equation Resolution
0.02α21−α=3.2×10−4  ⟹  α2=3.2×10−40.02(1−α)=1.6×10−2(1−α)\frac{0.02 \alpha^2}{1 - \alpha} = 3.2 \times 10^{-4} \implies \alpha^2 = \frac{3.2 \times 10^{-4}}{0.02}(1 - \alpha) = 1.6 \times 10^{-2}(1 - \alpha)
α2+1.6×10−2α−1.6×10−2=0\alpha^2 + 1.6 \times 10^{-2}\alpha - 1.6 \times 10^{-2} = 0
α=−1.6×10−2+(1.6×10−2)2−4(1)(−1.6×10−2)2=−0.016+0.000256+0.0642\alpha = \frac{-1.6 \times 10^{-2} + \sqrt{(1.6 \times 10^{-2})^2 - 4(1)(-1.6 \times 10^{-2})}}{2} = \frac{-0.016 + \sqrt{0.000256 + 0.064}}{2}
0.064256≈0.2535\sqrt{0.064256} \approx 0.2535
α=−0.016+0.25352=0.23752=0.11875≈0.12\alpha = \frac{-0.016 + 0.2535}{2} = \frac{0.2375}{2} = 0.11875 \approx 0.12

Calculating equilibrium concentrations:

  • [H3O+]=[F−]=cα=0.02×0.12=2.4×10−3 M[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] = [\mathrm{F}^-] = c\alpha = 0.02 \times 0.12 = 2.4 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • [HF]=c(1−α)=0.02(1−0.12)=0.02×0.88=1.76×10−2 M=17.6×10−3 M[\mathrm{HF}] = c(1 - \alpha) = 0.02(1 - 0.12) = 0.02 \times 0.88 = 1.76 \times 10^{-2}\text{ M} = 17.6 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • pH=−log⁡10(2.4×10−3)=3−log⁡102.4=3−0.3802=2.62\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(2.4 \times 10^{-3}) = 3 - \log_{10} 2.4 = 3 - 0.3802 = 2.62

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Hydrofluoric acid is a moderately weak acid. In dilute 0.02 M0.02\text{ M} solution, roughly 12%12\% of molecules ionize, yielding a low pH\text{pH} of 2.622.62.


NCERT Problem 6.19 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The pH\text{pH} of 0.1 M0.1\text{ M} monobasic acid is 4.504.50. Calculate the concentration of species H+\mathrm{H}^+, A−\mathrm{A}^-, and HA\mathrm{HA} at equilibrium. Also, determine the value of KaK_a and pKa\text{pK}_a of the monobasic acid.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • c=0.1 Mc = 0.1\text{ M}
  • pH=4.50\text{pH} = 4.50

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formulas
[H+]=10−pH,[A−]=[H+],[HA]=c−[H+],Ka=[H+][A−][HA][\mathrm{H}^+] = 10^{-\text{pH}}, \quad [\mathrm{A}^-] = [\mathrm{H}^+], \quad [\mathrm{HA}] = c - [\mathrm{H}^+], \quad K_a = \frac{[\mathrm{H}^+][\mathrm{A}^-]}{[\mathrm{HA}]}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
[H+]=10−4.50=100.50×10−5=3.16×10−5 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = 10^{-4.50} = 10^{0.50} \times 10^{-5} = 3.16 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}

  • [A−]=[H+]=3.16×10−5 M[\mathrm{A}^-] = [\mathrm{H}^+] = 3.16 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}
  • [HA]=0.1−3.16×10−5≈0.10 M[\mathrm{HA}] = 0.1 - 3.16 \times 10^{-5} \approx 0.10\text{ M}

Ka=(3.16×10−5)20.10=1.00×10−90.10=1.00×10−8K_a = \frac{(3.16 \times 10^{-5})^2}{0.10} = \frac{1.00 \times 10^{-9}}{0.10} = 1.00 \times 10^{-8}
pKa=−log⁡10(1.0×10−8)=8.00\text{pK}_a = -\log_{10}(1.0 \times 10^{-8}) = 8.00

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
With pKa=8.00\text{pK}_a = 8.00, this monobasic acid is extremely weak (comparable to hypobromous acid), ionizing to less than 0.032%0.032\% in a 0.1 M0.1\text{ M} solution.


NCERT Problem 6.20 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Calculate the pH\text{pH} of a 0.08 M0.08\text{ M} solution of hypochlorous acid, HOCl\mathrm{HOCl}. The ionization constant of the acid is 2.5×10−52.5 \times 10^{-5}. Determine the percent dissociation of HOCl\mathrm{HOCl}.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • c=0.08 Mc = 0.08\text{ M}
  • Ka=2.5×10−5K_a = 2.5 \times 10^{-5}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Ka=x2c−x≈x2c  ⟹  x=Ka⋅cK_a = \frac{x^2}{c - x} \approx \frac{x^2}{c} \implies x = \sqrt{K_a \cdot c}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
x2=2.5×10−5×0.08=2.0×10−6x^2 = 2.5 \times 10^{-5} \times 0.08 = 2.0 \times 10^{-6}
x=[H+]=2.0×10−6=1.414×10−3 Mx = [\mathrm{H}^+] = \sqrt{2.0 \times 10^{-6}} = 1.414 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}

Check validity of x≪cx \ll c:
α=1.414×10−30.08=0.01768=1.77%(<5%, approximation valid)\alpha = \frac{1.414 \times 10^{-3}}{0.08} = 0.01768 = 1.77\% \quad (< 5\%, \text{ approximation valid})
Percent dissociation=1.77%\text{Percent dissociation} = 1.77\%
pH=−log⁡10(1.414×10−3)=3−log⁡101.414=3−0.1505=2.85\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(1.414 \times 10^{-3}) = 3 - \log_{10} 1.414 = 3 - 0.1505 = 2.85

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Household bleach solutions contain hypochlorite ions; in weak acid form, only 1.77%1.77\% of HOCl\mathrm{HOCl} molecules are ionized at this concentration.


NCERT Problem 6.21 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The pH\text{pH} of a 0.004 M0.004\text{ M} hydrazine solution is 9.79.7. Calculate its ionization constant KbK_b and pKb\text{pK}_b.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • c=0.004 Mc = 0.004\text{ M}
  • pH=9.7\text{pH} = 9.7

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formulas
pOH=14.0−pH=14.0−9.7=4.3\text{pOH} = 14.0 - \text{pH} = 14.0 - 9.7 = 4.3
[OH−]=10−pOH=10−4.3=100.7×10−5≈5.01×10−5 M[\mathrm{OH}^-] = 10^{-\text{pOH}} = 10^{-4.3} = 10^{0.7} \times 10^{-5} \approx 5.01 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}
(Using textbook value with [H+]=10−9.7=1.67×10−10 M  ⟹  [OH−]=10−141.67×10−10=5.98×10−5 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = 10^{-9.7} = 1.67 \times 10^{-10}\text{ M} \implies [\mathrm{OH}^-] = \frac{10^{-14}}{1.67 \times 10^{-10}} = 5.98 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M})

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
Kb=[NH2NH3+][OH−][NH2NH2]=(5.98×10−5)20.004=3.576×10−94.0×10−3=8.96×10−7K_b = \frac{[\mathrm{NH}_2\mathrm{NH}_3^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{NH}_2\mathrm{NH}_2]} = \frac{(5.98 \times 10^{-5})^2}{0.004} = \frac{3.576 \times 10^{-9}}{4.0 \times 10^{-3}} = 8.96 \times 10^{-7}
pKb=−log⁡10(8.96×10−7)=7−log⁡108.96=7−0.9523=6.05\text{pK}_b = -\log_{10}(8.96 \times 10^{-7}) = 7 - \log_{10} 8.96 = 7 - 0.9523 = 6.05

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Hydrazine is a significantly weaker base than ammonia (pKb=4.75\text{pK}_b = 4.75), with an ionization constant nearly two orders of magnitude lower.


NCERT Problem 6.22 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Calculate the pH\text{pH} of the solution in which 0.2 M NH4Cl0.2\text{ M } \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl} and 0.1 M NH30.1\text{ M } \mathrm{NH}_3 are present. The pKb\text{pK}_b of ammonia solution is 4.754.75.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • [NH3]=0.10 M[\mathrm{NH}_3] = 0.10\text{ M}
  • [NH4+]=0.20 M[\mathrm{NH}_4^+] = 0.20\text{ M} (from fully dissociated NH4Cl\mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl})
  • pKb=4.75  ⟹  Kb=10−4.75=1.77×10−5\text{pK}_b = 4.75 \implies K_b = 10^{-4.75} = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
NH3+H2O⇌NH4++OH−\mathrm{NH}_3 + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4^+ + \mathrm{OH}^-
Kb=[NH4+][OH−][NH3]=(0.20+x)x0.10−x≈0.20x0.10=2xK_b = \frac{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{NH}_3]} = \frac{(0.20 + x)x}{0.10 - x} \approx \frac{0.20 x}{0.10} = 2x

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
2x=1.77×10−5  ⟹  x=[OH−]=1.77×10−52=0.885×10−5 M2x = 1.77 \times 10^{-5} \implies x = [\mathrm{OH}^-] = \frac{1.77 \times 10^{-5}}{2} = 0.885 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}
[H+]=Kw[OH−]=1.0×10−140.885×10−5=1.13×10−9 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = \frac{K_w}{[\mathrm{OH}^-]} = \frac{1.0 \times 10^{-14}}{0.885 \times 10^{-5}} = 1.13 \times 10^{-9}\text{ M}
pH=−log⁡10(1.13×10−9)=9−log⁡101.13=9−0.053=8.95\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(1.13 \times 10^{-9}) = 9 - \log_{10} 1.13 = 9 - 0.053 = 8.95

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
In pure 0.1 M NH30.1\text{ M } \mathrm{NH}_3, [OH−]≈1.33×10−3 M[\mathrm{OH}^-] \approx 1.33 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M} (pH=11.12\text{pH} = 11.12). The presence of 0.2 M NH4+0.2\text{ M } \mathrm{NH}_4^+ exerts a dramatic common-ion effect, suppressing ammonia dissociation by more than 150-fold150\text{-fold} and reducing the pH\text{pH} to 8.958.95.


NCERT Problem 6.23 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Determine the degree of ionization and pH\text{pH} of a 0.05 M0.05\text{ M} ammonia solution (Kb=1.77×10−5K_b = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}). Also, calculate the ionization constant of the conjugate acid of ammonia.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • c=0.05 Mc = 0.05\text{ M}
  • Kb=1.77×10−5K_b = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formulas
α=Kbc,[OH−]=cα,Ka=KwKb\alpha = \sqrt{\frac{K_b}{c}}, \quad [\mathrm{OH}^-] = c\alpha, \quad K_a = \frac{K_w}{K_b}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
α=1.77×10−50.05=3.54×10−4=0.0188≈0.018(1.8%)\alpha = \sqrt{\frac{1.77 \times 10^{-5}}{0.05}} = \sqrt{3.54 \times 10^{-4}} = 0.0188 \approx 0.018 \quad (1.8\%)
[OH−]=cα=0.05×0.0188=9.4×10−4 M[\mathrm{OH}^-] = c\alpha = 0.05 \times 0.0188 = 9.4 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}
[H+]=10−149.4×10−4=1.064×10−11 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = \frac{10^{-14}}{9.4 \times 10^{-4}} = 1.064 \times 10^{-11}\text{ M}
pH=−log⁡10(1.064×10−11)=10.97\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(1.064 \times 10^{-11}) = 10.97

Ionization constant of conjugate acid NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+:
Ka=KwKb=1.0×10−141.77×10−5=5.65×10−10K_a = \frac{K_w}{K_b} = \frac{1.0 \times 10^{-14}}{1.77 \times 10^{-5}} = 5.65 \times 10^{-10}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
In 0.05 M0.05\text{ M} solution, only 1.8%1.8\% of ammonia molecules are protonated. The conjugate acid NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+ is a very weak acid (Ka=5.65×10−10K_a = 5.65 \times 10^{-10}).


NCERT Problem 6.24 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Calculate the pH\text{pH} of a 0.10 M0.10\text{ M} ammonia solution. Calculate the pH\text{pH} after 50.0 mL50.0\text{ mL} of this solution is treated with 25.0 mL25.0\text{ mL} of 0.10 M HCl0.10\text{ M HCl} (Kb=1.77×10−5K_b = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}).

Step 1: Part A (Before Neutralization)

  • c=0.10 Mc = 0.10\text{ M}, Kb=1.77×10−5K_b = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}
  • [OH−]=Kb⋅c=1.77×10−5×0.10=1.77×10−6=1.33×10−3 M[\mathrm{OH}^-] = \sqrt{K_b \cdot c} = \sqrt{1.77 \times 10^{-5} \times 0.10} = \sqrt{1.77 \times 10^{-6}} = 1.33 \times 10^{-3}\text{ M}
  • [H+]=10−141.33×10−3=7.51×10−12 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = \frac{10^{-14}}{1.33 \times 10^{-3}} = 7.51 \times 10^{-12}\text{ M}
  • pH=−log⁡10(7.51×10−12)=11.12\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(7.51 \times 10^{-12}) = 11.12

Step 2: Part B Stoichiometric Neutralization

  • Initial millimoles of NH3=50.0 mL×0.10 M=5.0 mmol\mathrm{NH}_3 = 50.0\text{ mL} \times 0.10\text{ M} = 5.0\text{ mmol}
  • Added millimoles of HCl=25.0 mL×0.10 M=2.5 mmol\mathrm{HCl} = 25.0\text{ mL} \times 0.10\text{ M} = 2.5\text{ mmol}
  • Neutralization reaction: NH3+HCl→NH4++Cl−\mathrm{NH}_3 + \mathrm{HCl} \rightarrow \mathrm{NH}_4^+ + \mathrm{Cl}^-
  • Millimoles of NH3\mathrm{NH}_3 remaining unneutralized =5.0−2.5=2.5 mmol= 5.0 - 2.5 = 2.5\text{ mmol}
  • Millimoles of NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+ formed =2.5 mmol= 2.5\text{ mmol}
  • Total new solution volume =50.0 mL+25.0 mL=75.0 mL= 50.0\text{ mL} + 25.0\text{ mL} = 75.0\text{ mL}

Step 3: Direct Substitution into Buffer Equation
Because the remaining unneutralized base and the formed conjugate acid are equimolar (2.5 mmol2.5\text{ mmol} each in the same volume):
[NH3]=[NH4+]=2.5 mmol75.0 mL=0.0333 M[\mathrm{NH}_3] = [\mathrm{NH}_4^+] = \frac{2.5\text{ mmol}}{75.0\text{ mL}} = 0.0333\text{ M}
Using the base ionization equilibrium:
Kb=[NH4+][OH−][NH3]=(0.0333)[OH−]0.0333=[OH−]K_b = \frac{[\mathrm{NH}_4^+][\mathrm{OH}^-]}{[\mathrm{NH}_3]} = \frac{(0.0333)[\mathrm{OH}^-]}{0.0333} = [\mathrm{OH}^-]
[OH−]=Kb=1.77×10−5 M[\mathrm{OH}^-] = K_b = 1.77 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}
[H+]=10−141.77×10−5=0.565×10−9 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = \frac{10^{-14}}{1.77 \times 10^{-5}} = 0.565 \times 10^{-9}\text{ M}
pH=−log⁡10(0.565×10−9)=9.25\text{pH} = -\log_{10}(0.565 \times 10^{-9}) = 9.25

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
At the exact half-equivalence point of a weak base titration, half the base is converted to conjugate acid, resulting in [Base]=[Conjugate Acid][\text{Base}] = [\text{Conjugate Acid}]. Under this condition, pOH=pKb=4.75\text{pOH} = \text{pK}_b = 4.75, and pH=14−4.75=9.25\text{pH} = 14 - 4.75 = 9.25.


6.11.6 Di- and Polybasic Acids and Polyacidic Bases#

Acids capable of donating more than one ionizable proton per molecule are termed polybasic or polyprotic acids.

For a diprotic acid H2X\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{X} (such as carbonic acid H2CO3\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{CO}_3 or oxalic acid H2C2O4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{O}_4), ionization proceeds in successive stages:

H2X(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+HX−(aq),Ka1=[H3O+][HX−][H2X]\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{X}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{HX}^-\text{(aq)}, \quad K_{a1} = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{HX}^-]}{[\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{X}]}

HX−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+X2−(aq),Ka2=[H3O+][X2−][HX−]\mathrm{HX}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{X}^{2-}\text{(aq)}, \quad K_{a2} = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{X}^{2-}]}{[\mathrm{HX}^-]}

Why Ka1≫Ka2≫Ka3K_{a1} \gg K_{a2} \gg K_{a3}

For every polyprotic acid, the successive ionization constants decrease by several orders of magnitude:

Ka1≫Ka2≫Ka3K_{a1} \gg K_{a2} \gg K_{a3}

Polyprotic AcidKa1K_{a1}Ka2K_{a2}Ka3K_{a3}Ratio Ka1/Ka2K_{a1}/K_{a2}
Oxalic Acid (H2C2O4\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{C}_2\mathrm{O}_4)5.9×10−25.9 \times 10^{-2}6.4×10−56.4 \times 10^{-5}omitted≈920\approx 920
Sulphurous Acid (H2SO3\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{SO}_3)1.7×10−21.7 \times 10^{-2}6.4×10−86.4 \times 10^{-8}omitted≈2.7×105\approx 2.7 \times 10^5
Phosphoric Acid (H3PO4\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{PO}_4)7.5×10−37.5 \times 10^{-3}6.2×10−86.2 \times 10^{-8}4.2×10−134.2 \times 10^{-13}≈1.2×105\approx 1.2 \times 10^5
Carbonic Acid (H2CO3\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{CO}_3)4.3×10−74.3 \times 10^{-7}5.6×10−115.6 \times 10^{-11}omitted≈7.7×103\approx 7.7 \times 10^3

Physical Origin: Electrostatic attraction dictates that removing a positively charged proton from a neutral molecule (H2X\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{X}) requires significantly less energy than pulling a proton away from a negatively charged monoanion (HX−\mathrm{HX}^-), which in turn is vastly easier than pulling a proton from a doubly negative dianion (X2−\mathrm{X}^{2-}).

Because Ka1≫Ka2K_{a1} \gg K_{a2}, the hydronium concentration in polyprotic acid solutions is governed almost exclusively by the first dissociation step.


6.11.7 Factors Affecting Acid Strength#

The extent to which an acid H−A\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{A} ionizes in water depends primarily on two atomic parameters:

  1. Bond Strength (Bond Dissociation Enthalpy): The energy required to break the covalent H−A\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{A} bond.
  2. Bond Polarity: The electronegativity difference between H\mathrm{H} and A\mathrm{A}, which induces partial ionic charge separation (Hδ+−Aδ−\mathrm{H}^{\delta+} - \mathrm{A}^{\delta-}).

Trend Down a Group: Bond Strength Dominates

When comparing binary acids formed by elements in the same group of the Periodic Table, atomic radius increases down the column, lengthening the bond and weakening bond dissociation enthalpy.

For Group 17 halogen acids:

HF≪HCl≪HBr≪HI\mathrm{HF} \ll \mathrm{HCl} \ll \mathrm{HBr} \ll \mathrm{HI}

Even though fluorine is the most electronegative element (making the H−F\mathrm{H}-\mathrm{F} bond the most polar), the tiny fluoride radius produces a very short, strong bond (574 kJ/mol574\text{ kJ/mol}). Consequently, HF\mathrm{HF} is a weak acid in water, while HI\mathrm{HI}, with its long, weak bond (299 kJ/mol299\text{ kJ/mol}), is a powerful strong acid.

Trend Across a Period: Electronegativity / Polarity Dominates

When comparing binary hydrides of elements in the same row of the Periodic Table, atomic radii are comparable, so bond polarity becomes the deciding factor.

For Period 2 hydrides:

CH4<NH3<H2O<HF\mathrm{CH}_4 < \mathrm{NH}_3 < \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} < \mathrm{HF}

As electronegativity increases from carbon (2.52.5) to fluorine (4.04.0), electron density is pulled away from hydrogen, facilitating proton transfer to solvent water molecules.


6.11.8 The Common-Ion Effect#

The Common-Ion Effect is the shift in equilibrium caused by the addition of an ionic compound that provides an ion already present in the equilibrium mixture. It is a direct manifestation of Le Chatelier's principle.

Consider the weak acid acetic acid:

CH3COOH(aq)⇌CH3COO−(aq)+H+(aq)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}^+\text{(aq)}

If sodium acetate (CH3COONa\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COONa}, a strong electrolyte) is dissolved into this solution, it dissociates completely, introducing a high concentration of common acetate ions (CH3COO−\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-).

In response to this added product ion, the equilibrium shifts in the reverse direction, consuming acetate ions and hydronium ions to regenerate un-ionized acetic acid molecules. As a result:

  • The degree of ionization α\alpha drops sharply.
  • The free [H+][\mathrm{H}^+] concentration decreases.
  • The solution pH\text{pH} rises.

6.11.9 Hydrolysis of Salts and the pH of Their Solutions#

When an ionic salt dissolves in water, it dissociates completely into its constituent cations and anions:

BA(s)→B+(aq)+A−(aq)\mathrm{BA}\text{(s)} \rightarrow \mathrm{B}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{A}^-\text{(aq)}

These ions can interact with water molecules. Hydrolysis is defined as the chemical interaction between water and the cation, the anion, or both ions of a salt, producing acidic or alkaline solutions.

1. Salt of a Strong Acid and a Strong Base (e.g. mathrmNaCl,mathrmKNO3,mathrmBaCl2mathrm{NaCl}, mathrm{KNO}_3, mathrm{BaCl}_2)

  • Cations of strong bases (Na+,K+,Ca2+\mathrm{Na}^+, \mathrm{K}^+, \mathrm{Ca}^{2+}) and anions of strong acids (Cl−,NO3−,SO42−\mathrm{Cl}^-, \mathrm{NO}_3^-, \mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}) have negligible affinity for protons or hydroxide ions.
  • They undergo hydration but do not hydrolyze.
  • The neutral autoionization balance of water ([H+]=[OH−]=10−7 M[\mathrm{H}^+] = [\mathrm{OH}^-] = 10^{-7}\text{ M}) remains undisturbed.
  • Solution pH=7.00\text{pH} = 7.00 (strictly neutral).

2. Salt of a Weak Acid and a Strong Base (e.g. mathrmCH3mathrmCOONa,mathrmNaCN,mathrmK2mathrmCO3mathrm{CH}_3mathrm{COONa}, mathrm{NaCN}, mathrm{K}_2mathrm{CO}_3)

  • The cation (Na+\mathrm{Na}^+) does not hydrolyze.
  • The anion (CH3COO−\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-), being the conjugate base of a weak acid, reacts with water:

CH3COO−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3COOH(aq)+OH−(aq)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}

  • This anionic hydrolysis produces excess OH−\mathrm{OH}^- ions, making the solution alkaline:

pH=7+12(pKa+log⁡10c)>7\text{pH} = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_a + \log_{10} c) > 7

3. Salt of a Strong Acid and a Weak Base (e.g. mathrmNH4mathrmCl,mathrmAlCl3,mathrmCuSO4mathrm{NH}_4mathrm{Cl}, mathrm{AlCl}_3, mathrm{CuSO}_4)

  • The anion (Cl−\mathrm{Cl}^-) does not hydrolyze.
  • The cation (NH4+\mathrm{NH}_4^+), being the conjugate acid of a weak base, donates a proton to water:

NH4+(aq)+H2O(l)⇌NH4OH(aq)+H+(aq)\mathrm{NH}_4^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{OH}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}^+\text{(aq)}

  • This cationic hydrolysis produces excess H+\mathrm{H}^+ ions, making the solution acidic:

pH=7−12(pKb+log⁡10c)<7\text{pH} = 7 - \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_b + \log_{10} c) < 7

4. Salt of a Weak Acid and a Weak Base (e.g. mathrmCH3mathrmCOONH4,mathrmNH4mathrmCNmathrm{CH}_3mathrm{COONH}_4, mathrm{NH}_4mathrm{CN})

  • Both cation and anion undergo simultaneous hydrolysis:

NH4++CH3COO−+H2O⇌NH4OH+CH3COOH\mathrm{NH}_4^+ + \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^- + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{OH} + \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}

  • Remarkably, the degree of hydrolysis and the resulting pH\text{pH} are independent of solution concentration:

pH=7+12(pKa−pKb)\text{pH} = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_a - \text{pK}_b)

  • If pKa<pKb\text{pK}_a < \text{pK}_b: acid is stronger than base   ⟹  pH<7\implies \text{pH} < 7 (slightly acidic).
  • If pKa>pKb\text{pK}_a > \text{pK}_b: base is stronger than acid   ⟹  pH>7\implies \text{pH} > 7 (slightly basic).
  • If pKa=pKb\text{pK}_a = \text{pK}_b: pH=7.00\text{pH} = 7.00 (neutral).

NCERT Problem 6.25 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The pKa\text{pK}_a of acetic acid and pKb\text{pK}_b of ammonium hydroxide are 4.764.76 and 4.754.75 respectively. Calculate the pH\text{pH} of ammonium acetate solution.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • pKa=4.76\text{pK}_a = 4.76
  • pKb=4.75\text{pK}_b = 4.75

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
pH=7+12(pKa−pKb)\text{pH} = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_a - \text{pK}_b)

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
pH=7+12(4.76−4.75)=7+12(0.01)=7+0.005=7.005\text{pH} = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(4.76 - 4.75) = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(0.01) = 7 + 0.005 = 7.005

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
Because the acid ionization constant of acetic acid is nearly identical to the base ionization constant of ammonia, hydrolysis of both ions balances almost perfectly, yielding an effectively neutral solution (pH≈7.01\text{pH} \approx 7.01).


6.12 Buffer Solutions#

Solutions that resist drastic changes in pH\text{pH} upon the addition of small quantities of strong acid or base, or upon dilution, are termed Buffer Solutions.

Buffers are categorized into two major classes:

  1. Acidic Buffers: Composed of a weak acid and its salt with a strong base (e.g. CH3COOH+CH3COONa\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH} + \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COONa}). Operates effectively in the acidic range (pH 4−6\text{pH } 4 - 6).
  2. Basic Buffers: Composed of a weak base and its salt with a strong acid (e.g. NH4OH+NH4Cl\mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{OH} + \mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl}). Operates effectively in the basic range (pH 8−10\text{pH } 8 - 10).

6.12.1 Mechanism of Buffer Action (Acidic Buffer Example)#

Consider an equimolar buffer containing acetic acid and sodium acetate:

  • Sodium acetate dissociates completely: CH3COONa→CH3COO−+Na+\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COONa} \rightarrow \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^- + \mathrm{Na}^+
  • Acetic acid exists in dynamic equilibrium: CH3COOH⇌CH3COO−+H+\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^- + \mathrm{H}^+
  1. When strong acid (H+\mathrm{H}^+) is added:
    The added protons are captured by the reservoir of conjugate base acetate ions:

CH3COO−(aq)+H+(aq)→CH3COOH(aq)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}^+\text{(aq)} \rightarrow \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(aq)}

Because strong H+\mathrm{H}^+ ions are converted into weakly dissociated neutral acetic acid molecules, the free hydronium concentration remains virtually constant. 2. When strong base (OH−\mathrm{OH}^-) is added:
The added hydroxide ions react with un-ionized acetic acid molecules:

CH3COOH(aq)+OH−(aq)→CH3COO−(aq)+H2O(l)\mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COOH}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)} \rightarrow \mathrm{CH}_3\mathrm{COO}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)}

Because strong OH−\mathrm{OH}^- ions are neutralized to form water and acetate, the pH\text{pH} change is negligible.


6.12.2 The Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation#

For the weak acid equilibrium:

HA(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+A−(aq)\mathrm{HA}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\text{(l)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{A}^-\text{(aq)}

Ka=[H3O+][A−][HA]K_a = \frac{[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+][\mathrm{A}^-]}{[\mathrm{HA}]}

Rearranging for [H3O+][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+]:

[H3O+]=Ka⋅[HA][A−][\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] = K_a \cdot \frac{[\mathrm{HA}]}{[\mathrm{A}^-]}

Taking negative base-10 logarithms of both sides:

−log⁡10[H3O+]=−log⁡10Ka−log⁡10([HA][A−])-\log_{10}[\mathrm{H}_3\mathrm{O}^+] = -\log_{10} K_a - \log_{10}\left(\frac{[\mathrm{HA}]}{[\mathrm{A}^-]}\right)

pH=pKa+log⁡10([A−][HA])\text{pH} = \text{pK}_a + \log_{10}\left(\frac{[\mathrm{A}^-]}{[\mathrm{HA}]}\right)

Because the weak acid ionizes only minimally, [HA]≈[Acid]initial[\mathrm{HA}] \approx [\text{Acid}]_{\text{initial}}. Because sodium salt dissociates completely, [A−]≈[Salt][\mathrm{A}^-] \approx [\text{Salt}]. This gives the celebrated Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation for Acidic Buffers:

pH=pKa+log⁡10([Salt][Acid])\text{pH} = \text{pK}_a + \log_{10}\left(\frac{[\text{Salt}]}{[\text{Acid}]}\right)

Similarly, for basic buffers:

pOH=pKb+log⁡10([Salt][Base])\text{pOH} = \text{pK}_b + \log_{10}\left(\frac{[\text{Salt}]}{[\text{Base}]}\right)

pH=14.00−pOH\text{pH} = 14.00 - \text{pOH}

Two Essential Properties of Buffers

  1. Equal Concentration Equivalence: When [Salt]=[Acid][\text{Salt}] = [\text{Acid}], the log term becomes log⁡10(1)=0\log_{10}(1) = 0, so pH=pKa\text{pH} = \text{pK}_a. To prepare a buffer of target pH\text{pH}, select an acid whose pKa\text{pK}_a is as close as possible to the target pH\text{pH}.
  2. Dilution Invariance: Diluting a buffer with pure water decreases [Salt][\text{Salt}] and [Acid][\text{Acid}] by the exact same ratio. Because their quotient remains unchanged inside the logarithm, the pH\text{pH} of a buffer is unaffected by dilution.

6.13 Solubility Equilibria of Sparingly Soluble Salts#

Solubility varies dramatically across ionic compounds:

  • Soluble Salts: Molar solubility >0.1 M> 0.1\text{ M} (e.g. NaCl,KNO3\mathrm{NaCl}, \mathrm{KNO}_3).
  • Slightly Soluble Salts: Molar solubility between 0.01 M0.01\text{ M} and 0.1 M0.1\text{ M}.
  • Sparingly Soluble Salts: Molar solubility <0.01 M< 0.01\text{ M} (e.g. AgCl,BaSO4,CaF2\mathrm{AgCl}, \mathrm{BaSO}_4, \mathrm{CaF}_2).

Dissolution of an ionic solid involves an energetic competition between:

  1. Lattice Enthalpy (ΔlatticeH∘\Delta_{\text{lattice}}H^{\circ}): Positive energetic penalty to separate cations and anions from the crystal lattice.
  2. Hydration Enthalpy (ΔhydH∘\Delta_{\text{hyd}}H^{\circ}): Negative enthalpy released as polar water molecules hydrate the freed ions.

For a salt to dissolve appreciably, its negative hydration enthalpy must overcome its lattice enthalpy. When a sparingly soluble salt is stirred in water, dissolution proceeds until an equilibrium is established between undissolved solid and dissolved hydrated ions.


6.13.1 The Solubility Product Constant (KspK_{sp})#

Consider barium sulphate in dynamic equilibrium with its saturated solution:

BaSO4(s)⇌waterBa2+(aq)+SO42−(aq)\mathrm{BaSO}_4\text{(s)} \overset{\text{water}}{\rightleftharpoons} \mathrm{Ba}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}\text{(aq)}

Because [BaSO4(s)][\mathrm{BaSO}_4\text{(s)}] is a pure solid with constant molar density, it is incorporated into the equilibrium constant:

Ksp=[Ba2+][SO42−]K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}][\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}]

The constant KspK_{sp} is defined as the Solubility Product Constant.

If SS represents the molar solubility of barium sulphate in pure water (in mol/L\text{mol/L}):

[Ba2+]=S,[SO42−]=S[\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}] = S, \quad [\mathrm{SO}_4^{2-}] = S

Ksp=S⋅S=S2  ⟹  S=KspK_{sp} = S \cdot S = S^2 \implies S = \sqrt{K_{sp}}

At 298 K298\text{ K}, Ksp(BaSO4)=1.1×10−10K_{sp}(\mathrm{BaSO}_4) = 1.1 \times 10^{-10}:

S=1.1×10−10=1.05×10−5 mol/LS = \sqrt{1.1 \times 10^{-10}} = 1.05 \times 10^{-5}\text{ mol/L}


General Stoichiometric Formula for KspK_{sp} and Solubility SS#

For any general sparingly soluble ionic salt of formula MxXy\mathrm{M}_x\mathrm{X}_y:

MxXy(s)⇌xMp+(aq)+yXq−(aq)\mathrm{M}_x\mathrm{X}_y\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons x\mathrm{M}^{p+}\text{(aq)} + y\mathrm{X}^{q-}\text{(aq)}

Let SS be the molar solubility:

  • [Mp+]=xS[\mathrm{M}^{p+}] = xS
  • [Xq−]=yS[\mathrm{X}^{q-}] = yS

Ksp=[Mp+]x[Xq−]y=(xS)x(yS)y=xxyySx+yK_{sp} = [\mathrm{M}^{p+}]^x [\mathrm{X}^{q-}]^y = (xS)^x (yS)^y = x^x y^y S^{x+y}

S=(Kspxxyy)1x+yS = \left(\frac{K_{sp}}{x^x y^y}\right)^{\frac{1}{x+y}}

Salt Formula TypeStoichiometric DissociationKspK_{sp} in terms of SSSolubility SS in terms of KspK_{sp}Example Salt
ABAB type (1:11:1)AgCl⇌Ag++Cl−\mathrm{AgCl} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ag}^+ + \mathrm{Cl}^-Ksp=(S)(S)=S2K_{sp} = (S)(S) = S^2S=KspS = \sqrt{K_{sp}}AgCl,BaSO4\mathrm{AgCl}, \mathrm{BaSO}_4
AB2AB_2 or A2BA_2B type (1:21:2)PbCl2⇌Pb2++2Cl−\mathrm{PbCl}_2 \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Pb}^{2+} + 2\mathrm{Cl}^-Ksp=(S)(2S)2=4S3K_{sp} = (S)(2S)^2 = 4S^3S=Ksp43S = \sqrt[3]{\frac{K_{sp}}{4}}PbCl2,CaF2,Ag2CrO4\mathrm{PbCl}_2, \mathrm{CaF}_2, \mathrm{Ag}_2\mathrm{CrO}_4
AB3AB_3 type (1:31:3)Fe(OH)3⇌Fe3++3OH−\mathrm{Fe(OH)}_3 \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Fe}^{3+} + 3\mathrm{OH}^-Ksp=(S)(3S)3=27S4K_{sp} = (S)(3S)^3 = 27S^4S=Ksp274S = \sqrt[4]{\frac{K_{sp}}{27}}Fe(OH)3,Al(OH)3\mathrm{Fe(OH)}_3, \mathrm{Al(OH)}_3
A2B3A_2B_3 type (2:32:3)A2X3⇌2A3++3X2−\mathrm{A}_2\mathrm{X}_3 \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{A}^{3+} + 3\mathrm{X}^{2-}Ksp=(2S)2(3S)3=108S5K_{sp} = (2S)^2 (3S)^3 = 108S^5S=Ksp1085S = \sqrt[5]{\frac{K_{sp}}{108}}As2S3,Bi2S3\mathrm{As}_2\mathrm{S}_3, \mathrm{Bi}_2\mathrm{S}_3
A3B4A_3B_4 type (3:43:4)Zr3(PO4)4⇌3Zr4++4PO43−\mathrm{Zr}_3(\mathrm{PO}_4)_4 \rightleftharpoons 3\mathrm{Zr}^{4+} + 4\mathrm{PO}_4^{3-}Ksp=(3S)3(4S)4=6912S7K_{sp} = (3S)^3 (4S)^4 = 6912S^7S=Ksp69127S = \sqrt[7]{\frac{K_{sp}}{6912}}Zirconium phosphate

Criteria for Precipitation: Ionic Product (QspQ_{sp}) vs KspK_{sp}#

The product of actual instantaneous ion concentrations in a solution (each raised to their stoichiometric power) is defined as the Ionic Product (QspQ_{sp}):

ConditionSaturation StatusSpontaneous Laboratory Observation
Qsp<KspQ_{sp} < K_{sp}Unsaturated SolutionNo precipitation can occur. If solid is introduced, more will dissolve until Qsp=KspQ_{sp} = K_{sp}.
Qsp=KspQ_{sp} = K_{sp}Saturated SolutionDynamic equilibrium exists between dissolved ions and undissolved solid.
Qsp>KspQ_{sp} > K_{sp}Supersaturated SolutionPrecipitation occurs immediately until excess ions leave solution and QspQ_{sp} returns to KspK_{sp}.

NCERT Problem 6.26 (Step-by-Step Solution):
Calculate the solubility of A2X3\mathrm{A}_2\mathrm{X}_3 in pure water, assuming that neither kind of ion reacts with water. The solubility product of A2X3\mathrm{A}_2\mathrm{X}_3 is Ksp=1.1×10−23K_{sp} = 1.1 \times 10^{-23}.

Step 1: Given Quantities

  • Reaction: A2X3(s)⇌2A3+(aq)+3X2−(aq)\mathrm{A}_2\mathrm{X}_3\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{A}^{3+}\text{(aq)} + 3\mathrm{X}^{2-}\text{(aq)}
  • Ksp=1.1×10−23K_{sp} = 1.1 \times 10^{-23}

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Let SS be the molar solubility:
[A3+]=2S,[X2−]=3S[\mathrm{A}^{3+}] = 2S, \quad [\mathrm{X}^{2-}] = 3S
Ksp=[A3+]2[X2−]3=(2S)2(3S)3=4S2×27S3=108S5K_{sp} = [\mathrm{A}^{3+}]^2 [\mathrm{X}^{2-}]^3 = (2S)^2 (3S)^3 = 4S^2 \times 27S^3 = 108 S^5

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Arithmetic Computation
108S5=1.1×10−23=110×10−25108 S^5 = 1.1 \times 10^{-23} = 110 \times 10^{-25}
S5=110×10−25108≈1.0185×10−25≈1.0×10−25S^5 = \frac{110 \times 10^{-25}}{108} \approx 1.0185 \times 10^{-25} \approx 1.0 \times 10^{-25}
Taking the fifth root:
S=(1.0×10−25)1/5=1.0×10−5 mol/LS = (1.0 \times 10^{-25})^{1/5} = 1.0 \times 10^{-5}\text{ mol/L}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Laboratory Insight
The molar solubility is 1.0×10−5 mol/L1.0 \times 10^{-5}\text{ mol/L}, producing [A3+]=2.0×10−5 M[\mathrm{A}^{3+}] = 2.0 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M} and [X2−]=3.0×10−5 M[\mathrm{X}^{2-}] = 3.0 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}.


NCERT Problem 6.27 (Step-by-Step Solution):
The values of KspK_{sp} of two sparingly soluble salts Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 and AgCN\mathrm{AgCN} are 2.0×10−152.0 \times 10^{-15} and 6.0×10−176.0 \times 10^{-17} respectively. Which salt is more soluble? Explain.

Step 1: Given Quantities and Warning on Direct KspK_{sp} Comparison
Direct comparison of KspK_{sp} values is meaningful only when comparing salts of the exact same stoichiometry. Here, AgCN\mathrm{AgCN} is an ABAB salt, whereas Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 is an AB2AB_2 salt. We must calculate molar solubility SS for each.

Step 2: Solubility of AgCN\mathrm{AgCN} (1:11:1 Salt)
AgCN(s)⇌Ag+(aq)+CN−(aq)\mathrm{AgCN}\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ag}^+\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{CN}^-\text{(aq)}
Ksp=S12=6.0×10−17=60×10−18K_{sp} = S_1^2 = 6.0 \times 10^{-17} = 60 \times 10^{-18}
S1=60×10−18=7.75×10−9 mol/LS_1 = \sqrt{60 \times 10^{-18}} = 7.75 \times 10^{-9}\text{ mol/L}

Step 3: Solubility of Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 (1:21:2 Salt)
Ni(OH)2(s)⇌Ni2+(aq)+2OH−(aq)\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ni}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\mathrm{OH}^-\text{(aq)}
Ksp=(S2)(2S2)2=4S23=2.0×10−15K_{sp} = (S_2)(2S_2)^2 = 4S_2^3 = 2.0 \times 10^{-15}
S23=2.0×10−154=0.50×10−15=500×10−18S_2^3 = \frac{2.0 \times 10^{-15}}{4} = 0.50 \times 10^{-15} = 500 \times 10^{-18}
S2=500×10−183=7.94×10−6 mol/LS_2 = \sqrt[3]{500 \times 10^{-18}} = 7.94 \times 10^{-6}\text{ mol/L}

Step 4: Comparison & Chemical Significance
Comparing S1S_1 and S2S_2:
S2(Ni(OH)2)=7.94×10−6 M≫S1(AgCN)=7.75×10−9 MS_2(\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2) = 7.94 \times 10^{-6}\text{ M} \gg S_1(\mathrm{AgCN}) = 7.75 \times 10^{-9}\text{ M}
Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 is more than 1000 times1000\text{ times} more soluble than AgCN\mathrm{AgCN}, despite its KspK_{sp} formula differing in power.


NCERT Problem 6.28 (Common-Ion Effect on Solubility):
Calculate the molar solubility of Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 in 0.10 M NaOH0.10\text{ M NaOH}. The solubility product of Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 is 2.0×10−152.0 \times 10^{-15}.

Step 1: Given Quantities & Common Ion Identification

  • Dissolution of Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2: Ni(OH)2(s)⇌Ni2++2OH−\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ni}^{2+} + 2\mathrm{OH}^-
  • Let SS be the molar solubility in the presence of NaOH\mathrm{NaOH}.
  • The solution already contains 0.10 M OH−0.10\text{ M } \mathrm{OH}^- from completely ionized strong base NaOH\mathrm{NaOH}.
  • Total [OH−]=0.10+2S[\mathrm{OH}^-] = 0.10 + 2S
  • Total [Ni2+]=S[\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}] = S

Step 2: Fundamental Governing Formula
Ksp=[Ni2+][OH−]2=S(0.10+2S)2=2.0×10−15K_{sp} = [\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}][\mathrm{OH}^-]^2 = S(0.10 + 2S)^2 = 2.0 \times 10^{-15}

Step 3: Direct Substitution & Chemical Approximation
Because KspK_{sp} is very small, 2S≪0.10 M2S \ll 0.10\text{ M}, so 0.10+2S≈0.10 M0.10 + 2S \approx 0.10\text{ M}:
S×(0.10)2=2.0×10−15S \times (0.10)^2 = 2.0 \times 10^{-15}
S×0.01=2.0×10−15  ⟹  S=2.0×10−1510−2=2.0×10−13 mol/LS \times 0.01 = 2.0 \times 10^{-15} \implies S = \frac{2.0 \times 10^{-15}}{10^{-2}} = 2.0 \times 10^{-13}\text{ mol/L}

Step 4: Physical Significance & Common-Ion Suppression
In pure water, the solubility of Ni(OH)2\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_2 is 7.94×10−6 M7.94 \times 10^{-6}\text{ M}. In 0.10 M NaOH0.10\text{ M NaOH}, the common hydroxide ion suppresses solubility by a factor of nearly 40 million40\text{ million} down to 2.0×10−13 M2.0 \times 10^{-13}\text{ M}.


Common-Ion Applications in Chemical Analysis and Industry#

  1. Purification of Common Salt (mathrmNaClmathrm{NaCl}):
    Crude rock salt contains impurities like sodium sulphate, calcium chloride, and magnesium chloride. When a saturated solution of crude salt is treated by bubbling dry hydrogen chloride gas (HCl\mathrm{HCl}) through it, the high concentration of chloride ions causes Qsp(NaCl)>Ksp(NaCl)Q_{sp}(\mathrm{NaCl}) > K_{sp}(\mathrm{NaCl}). High-purity crystalline NaCl\mathrm{NaCl} precipitates out, while more soluble calcium and magnesium chlorides remain dissolved.
  2. Qualitative Cation Analysis (Salt Analysis):
    • Group II basic radicals (Cu2+,Cd2+,Pb2+,Bi3+\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}, \mathrm{Cd}^{2+}, \mathrm{Pb}^{2+}, \mathrm{Bi}^{3+}) are precipitated as sulphides in the presence of dilute HCl\mathrm{HCl}. The H+\mathrm{H}^+ from HCl\mathrm{HCl} suppresses the ionization of weak diprotic acid H2S\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{S}, providing just enough [S2−][\mathrm{S}^{2-}] to exceed the very low KspK_{sp} of Group II sulphides without precipitating the higher KspK_{sp} sulphides of Group IV (Zn2+,Mn2+,Ni2+\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}, \mathrm{Mn}^{2+}, \mathrm{Ni}^{2+}).
    • Group III basic radicals (Fe3+,Al3+,Cr3+\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}, \mathrm{Al}^{3+}, \mathrm{Cr}^{3+}) are precipitated as hydroxides using NH4OH\mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{OH} in the presence of NH4Cl\mathrm{NH}_4\mathrm{Cl}. The common ammonium ion suppresses hydroxide concentration, precipitating only the least soluble Group III hydroxides while keeping Group V cations in solution.

Effect of pH on Solubility of Salts of Weak Acids#

The solubility of sparingly soluble salts containing basic anions (such as carbonates CO32−\mathrm{CO}_3^{2-}, phosphates PO43−\mathrm{PO}_4^{3-}, fluorides F−\mathrm{F}^-, or sulphides S2−\mathrm{S}^{2-}) increases dramatically in acidic solutions (lower pH\text{pH}).

Consider calcium fluoride:

CaF2(s)⇌Ca2+(aq)+2F−(aq)\mathrm{CaF}_2\text{(s)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\mathrm{F}^-\text{(aq)}

When acid is added to the solution, excess hydronium ions react with fluoride anions to form weakly dissociated hydrofluoric acid:

F−(aq)+H+(aq)⇌HF(aq)\mathrm{F}^-\text{(aq)} + \mathrm{H}^+\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{HF}\text{(aq)}

This consumption depletes free [F−][\mathrm{F}^-] in solution. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the solid dissolution equilibrium shifts forward to replenish [F−][\mathrm{F}^-], dramatically increasing the solubility of CaF2\mathrm{CaF}_2.

Quantitatively, if KaK_a is the acid dissociation constant of the conjugate acid HX\mathrm{HX}, the effective solubility SS at a given [H+][\mathrm{H}^+] is:

S=[Ksp([H+]+Ka)Ka]1/2S = \left[\frac{K_{sp}([\mathrm{H}^+] + K_a)}{K_a}\right]^{1/2}

As [H+][\mathrm{H}^+] increases (decreasing pH\text{pH}), SS increases without bound until all solid dissolves. This explains why teeth enamel (primarily hydroxyapatite / calcium phosphate) dissolves rapidly in acidic oral environments, leading to tooth decay.


6.14 Chapter Summary: Essential Takeaways#

  1. Dynamic Equilibrium: Attained when opposing processes occur simultaneously at identical rates (rf=rrr_f = r_r). Macro-properties remain static while microscopic exchange continues.
  2. Equilibrium Constant KcK_c and KpK_p: Governed by the Law of Mass Action. Related for gaseous reactions by Kp=Kc(RT)ΔngK_p = K_c(RT)^{\Delta n_g}.
  3. Pure Condensed Phases: The concentrations of pure solids and pure liquids are constant and omitted from equilibrium constant expressions.
  4. Reaction Quotient QQ: Determines spontaneous direction: Q<KQ < K moves forward, Q>KQ > K moves backward, Q=KQ = K is at equilibrium.
  5. Thermodynamic Link: ΔrG∘=−RTln⁡K=−2.303RTlog⁡10K\Delta_r G^{\circ} = -RT \ln K = -2.303 RT \log_{10} K. Spontaneous reactions have ΔrG∘<0\Delta_r G^{\circ} < 0 and K>1K > 1.
  6. Le Chatelier's Principle: External perturbations (concentration, pressure, volume) shift equilibria to counteract the disturbance. Temperature change alters KK itself (van 't Hoff equation). Catalysts accelerate rate of attainment without altering equilibrium position or KK.
  7. Acids and Bases: Arrhenius (H+/OH−\mathrm{H}^+/\mathrm{OH}^- in water), Brönsted-Lowry (proton donor/acceptor, conjugate pairs), Lewis (electron pair acceptor/donor).
  8. Water Autoionization and pH: Kw=[H+][OH−]=1.0×10−14K_w = [\mathrm{H}^+][\mathrm{OH}^-] = 1.0 \times 10^{-14} at 298 K298\text{ K}. pH=−log⁡10[H+]\text{pH} = -\log_{10}[\mathrm{H}^+], and pH+pOH=14.00\text{pH} + \text{pOH} = 14.00.
  9. Weak Electrolytes: Governed by Ostwald's dilution law α≈K/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K / c}. Polyprotic acids have Ka1≫Ka2≫Ka3K_{a1} \gg K_{a2} \gg K_{a3} due to electrostatic barriers.
  10. Salt Hydrolysis: Salts of weak acids and strong bases form alkaline solutions (pH>7\text{pH} > 7); salts of strong acids and weak bases form acidic solutions (pH<7\text{pH} < 7); salts of weak acids and weak bases have pH=7+12(pKa−pKb)\text{pH} = 7 + \frac{1}{2}(\text{pK}_a - \text{pK}_b), independent of concentration.
  11. Buffer Solutions: Resist pH\text{pH} changes; formulated via Henderson-Hasselbalch equations: pH=pKa+log⁡10([Salt]/[Acid])\text{pH} = \text{pK}_a + \log_{10}([\text{Salt}]/[\text{Acid}]). pH\text{pH} is invariant to dilution.
  12. Solubility Product KspK_{sp}: Governing constant for sparingly soluble salts. Precipitation occurs when Qsp>KspQ_{sp} > K_{sp}. Common-ion addition suppresses solubility. Salts of weak acids dissolve extensively at lower pH\text{pH}.
Student Lab Access

Interactive 3D Virtual Lab Locked

Notes: 100% Free

Comprehensive NCERT textbook notes, formulas, reaction mechanisms, and solved numericals are completely free to read.

To launch the hands-on 3D interactive simulations for Equilibrium (molecular rotators, quantum orbital viewers, and thermodynamic reaction chambers), simply sign in with your free Google student account.

Included in Free Student Account:
Interactive 3D molecular orbitals & geometries
Real-time Le Chatelier equilibrium stress testing
Bohr quantum jump photon emission lab
Thermodynamic piston work & Hess’s cycle solvers
No credit card required. Free access for NCERT Class 11 & 12 students.